Search results

Good luck with those wacky perversions of God's Word on Judgement Day . . .

Yes - whenever Scripturally-ignorant people are given passages from the Book of Revelation - they always claim that it is merely "symbolic" and therefore doesn't apply. The fact is that the "souls" being spoken of in Rev. 6:9-11 are CONSCIOUS to what is happening on earth below and are CRYING...

Sure - MY exegesis is "weak" - yet YOU offer nothing to refute it. I illustrated to you that your arguments fall flat in the face of ALL of the elements I presented. They include: - Prophetic Type and Fulfiollment (2 Sam. 6:9, Luke 1:43, 2 Sam. 6:14, Luke 2:38, 2 Sam. 6:11, Luke 1:56, 1 Sam...

I forgot about your wacky perversions - so I'll destroy your argument with ONE passage of Scripture and move on. These "non-existent", "dead souls" are verly much ALIVE, as we see in the following verses . . . Rev. 6-9-11 When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the SOULS of those...

For starters - and as I have explained ad nauseam - Limbo has NEVER been a doctrine of the Church. It is ALWAYS nothing more than a theological opinion used to reconcile what happened to those about whom Scripture is silent. As for Purgatory having "no place" in the Sciptures -you are correct...

Excuse me?? The poster to who you are referring (@Hobie) is not an innocent person who is merly "inquiring" about soething he doesn't understand. He is a well-known anti Cathoolic who trolls this and several other forums posting his dishonest manure. I'm not here to make friends - nor am I...

Your "mountain of evidence" is just another pathetic dung heap of historical bankruptcy. As I stated earlier, I've destroyed your moronic fairy tales before - so unless you have anything intelligent to say that's related to the topic - don't waste my time . . .

Tank you for finally admitting that . . . I sorrected your fellow anti-Catholic, @WaterSong - who was ignorantly using the term "RCC" (Roman Catholic Church). That's when YOU jumped in with your usual manure about the Catholic Church and pagan Rome being one and the same. We've had this...

ALL of this was already addressed in post #122. Yup - the SAME post that YOU keep dodging . . .

Okay - let's have an HONEST recap: YOU asked the following regarding the belief that Mary didn't have any children other than Jesus: So, in post #122 - I gave you a comprehensive Biblical explanation showing the OT Type and NT Fulfillments regarding the Ark of the Covenant and Mary and asked...

And there you go again with your total inability to differentiate a government and the Church. Anyway - the Catholic Church has ALWAYS just been the "Catholic Church". Oh, did you say that you're an ignoramus? Imagine that . . .

Sigh . . . another uninformed anti-Catholic - what a shame . . . You cannot argue the merits of your position because I proved you wrong on ALL points. ALL Catholic doctrine is encapulated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Limbo is NOT - nor has it EVER been listed in the Catechism as a...

Time for another history lesson, Einstein . . . When Henry VIII broke away from the ONE Catholic Church in the 16th century because he couldn't divorce his wife - he referred to HIS new invention asa the "Catholic Church of England" and the original Church, he referred to as the "Roman Catholic...

Hmmmmm - it's iteresting that YOU believe Jesus to be nothing but a liar and a charlatan who make promises that He can't keep. You see - Jesus stated that His Church would NEVER succumb to the gates of Hell (Matt. 16:18) - even if YOU don't buy it . . . As for Limbo - uhhhh, NO - youre wrong...

I'm NOT sure where you're going with your argument. Why are you discussing Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus?? As for Limbo - this was NEVER a doctrinal position within th Cathollic Church - so I'm confused as to WHY you're pursuing this. Can you shed some light? Finally - there is no "Roman...

I didn't call you anything. I simply challenged you to give me a sound Scriptural refutation of the Scriptural PROOF of the Type and Fulfillment that I laid out because you falsely claimed that I gave you "No evidence whatsoever". If you can't refute what I presented - just admit it.

And this response is a TEXTBOOK example of denial in defeat. In post #129, YOU said: I asked you to go back and read post #122 - which YOU say has "No evidence whatsoever". I am RE-posting it here for TWO reasons: 1. To show everybody that YOU are lying when you say I have you "no evidence...

WHY do you insist on repeating arguments that have ALREADY been explained and/or debunked?? For the argument about the "brethren of Jesus" - see my post #84 and get back to me on that. As for Matt. 1:25 - this does NOT prove that Mary and Joseph had marital relations. Only a novice, who has...

Read post #122 and we'll talk . . .

The Catechism is the instruction of Catholic doctrine. It's not a doctrine in and of itself. What is "RCC" and why do you use that term?