Search results

Keep your ad hominem to yourself. You are talking about yourself. You obviously cannot handle biblical rebuke. You have no answer to the Scriptures. You duck around them and misinterpret other to suit your error. What you espouse (Universalism) is recognized in orthodox Christian circles through...

This is all mere opinion. There is no biblical support for this. I suspect you know this as you make no attempt to support it with Scripture.

This is all mere opinion. There is no biblical support for this. I suspect you know this as you make no attempt to support it with Scripture.

Not true. You refuse to accept the clear and repeated teaching pertaining to end-times.

Grow up! You come across as so condescending. You cannot even provide corroboration for your private interpretations. Until you do, we can only view your pettiness and name calling as childish.

That is talking about the victory Jesus wrought over Hades that enables captivity to be taken captive and raised to heaven to reign in Christ.

You obviously have nothing on Amil , so you resort to lies lately. I will take this as a sign that you are putting up the white flag.

Ok. So your invention of an age between "this age" and "the age to come" is ok? Inventing a doctrine that has not been taught up until 3 chapters before the end of the Bible in the most obscure book in Scripture is smart? I don't think so!

You have one text which you impose private interpretation upon and you admit by your avoidance that you have no corroboration for.

Exactly! I was just thinking before you said that: why is it that Premils never take the battle up against heresy? It is always left to Amils.

What are you talking about? From where? About what? You are as clear as mud.

No, I reject your twisting of God's Word to support your heresy. You are yet to show what you claim. That is because it is an invention in your head. When wicked men are forced to bow the knee before Christ on judgment day, it is too late. Your liberal humanistic heresy will go up in a puff of...

You made the accusation and hung on your own gallows. That wasn't a very smart move for you. Your arguments and wording were largely a cut-and-paste exercise. Your accusations just went up in a puff of smoke. Now, are you going to address the rebuttals or are you going to continue to avoid the...

So, where is your biblical support for your faulty opinion of Rev 20?

Man can willingly bow the knee to Christ in this life and experience eternal life, or they can be required to do it on judgment day and face a lost eternity of eternal punishment. This is simple for those who have eyes to see.

He is coming to rescue His elect to the sky and torch this corrupt world with all the wicked on it. Why would He leave the righteouss here? That is ridiculous. That shows how your theology has confused your understanding of His return. It is the end! We are now into eternity.

It is hard to read your posts. The grammar is rough. No, your private opinion is what I reject. The Scripture reinforce Amil. You have zero corroboration for the Premil theory.

The ark is a picture of Christ when He comes to rescue all His elect. None miss it! The destruction that was poured out upon all the wicked tallies with the destruction of all those left behind when Jesus comes. It is immediate and total. None escape.

Where does it say that "the saints will reign with an Iron Rod" for a thousand years?

What are you talking about?