Search results

Nonsense. You're simply un-equipped to address any of the Scriptural evidence - so you dismiss it ALL. I run into this type of cowardice all too frequently on this forum. The fact remains that the doctrine of the Trinity is so embedded in Scripture that you can't escape it - unless you employ...

Your horrible grammar aside - you cherry-picked a verse of Scripture to make a point - and completely FAILED. That's the problem with cherry-picking verses out of context. Here is the verse in its FULL context: Eph, 4:4-6 There is one body and one Spirit—just as you were called to the one hope...

"Stupefied"? The teaching is solid. The only ones "stupefied by it are those, like YOU who can't seem to grasp it. It's funny - I laid out a pretty comprehensive Scriptural case for the Trinity right here on another thread: Are you saved now? You went on a multi-paragraph diatribe - but...

And yet - you you have FAILED at refuting even ONE Scriptural proof of the Trinity. Here you go, Einstein - have a field day . . . The Father is God Ephesians 4:6 One God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. Psalm 68:5 Father of the fatherless and protector of...

Yet you can't refute the very Scriptures that prove you wrong. THAT'S what makes your perversion a heresy. The Trinity is the most easily-provable doctrine out there. That's why your anti-Trinitarianism is the easiest one to defeat. Maybe that's why it was the first heresy that was...

Soooooo, you couldn't tell me what "heresy" is - could you? Like I said - with every post, your ignorance shines brighter and brighter . . . Here's a hint, Einstein: Rejection of the Trinity is the most basic heresy of Christianity. Virtually ALL other heresies spring from this one . . .

This is just as ignorant as saying there is "systematic racism" in the United States - the most NON-racist country in the world. Individuals were/are wicked within the Church. The Church was/is not "systematically wicked". For that to be true - Jesus Himself would be a liar for guaranteeing...

Absolutely.

No - you're a non-denominational NON Christian. Pseudo-Christian is more like it. Like I told you in another thread - you can't deny the very nature of God - then claim to be His follower.

I merely stated that by definition you are NOT a Christian. You can claim to "believe" in Christ until the COWS come home and STILL not be a Christian. A Christian is a Baptized Trinitarian follower of Christ. You cannot deny the very nature of God - then claim to "follow" Him. That would be...

Do you even understand what a heresy is? Your claim is made from an abject ignorance of the term.

The Trinity isn't a "symbol". The Trinity is Almighty God manifested in Three distinct Persons, as He is presented in Scripture. If you think the verses that speak to the reality of the Trinity are just "symbolic" - then you're rejecting the Word of God. Gen. 1:26, Matt. 28:19, John 15:26, 1...

Yes - there seems to be an epidemic of that around here . . .

Good point. However, as to your comment that the Trinity is of "man's imagination" - you are wrong. It's 100% Biblical (Gen. 1:26, Matt. 28:19, John 15:26, 1 Cor. 12:4-6, 2 Cor. 13:14, 1 John 5:7, Eph. 4:6, Psalm 68:5, Mal. 2:10, Isa. 63:16, 2 Cor. 1:3-4, John 3:16, John 8:41, 1 Thess. 3:13...

And there your go. You are the poster boy for faithlessness. Jesus GUARANTEED His Church that it would NOT succumb to the gates of Hell. YOU, on the other hand, believe it DID. Good luck telling that to Him when He is judging you . . . As to your final statement in RED - you're a...

Thanks you for your clarity and candor. You were right to say that you weren't a Protestant. True Protestants are Christians. Now, I know that I'm NOT dealing with a Christian at all - so your arguments are that much more worthless . . .

You've done NO such thing. In fact, ALL you've done is point out some wicked actions by some wicked individuals within the Church's 2000 year history - ALL the while, IGNORING the fact that Jesus Hims3lf chose a wicked man to be one of its first leaders. I have repeatedly destroyed this asinine...

And that is yet another ignorant and dishonest statement. Dishonest, because I have already PROVEN that the Catholic Church is Apostolic. Ignorant because Indulgences are indeed Biblical. Allow me to educate you - yet again . . . Sin causes guilt and punishment for which there can be both...

Ummmmmm - you ARE a Protestant. Unless you are a Catholic or Orthodox Christian - you are a PROTESTANT Christian - IF you're a Christian at all. A Protestant, by definition is non-Catholic, non-Orthodox Christian. Of course - you might belong to one of the quasi-Christian sects such as...

I just gave a Scriptural proof of Apostolic Succession AND an historical one. What is your refutation of these facts? Do you even HAVE one??