Search results

And once again - in your idiocy, you FAIL to understand that heterosexuality can be JUST as a sinful as homosexuality. Soooooo - is anybody BORN a heterosexual proclivity? Of course they are - just as there are those who are born with homosexual proclivity - although, for many , it is a...

And in your complete idiocy - you again FAIL to understand that "avoiding pregnancy" and contraception are TWO SEPARATE issues. Whereas the first simply involves the timing of a woman's menstrual/ovulation cycles - the other is deemed intrinsically evil. the Church has NEVER changed its...

How could you possibly make such a stupid statement? Oh, that's right - never mind.

Give me the context of what he is talking about. You approach current events like you do the Bible - little snippets taken OUT of context . . .

Nope. He didn't want the Argentine legislature to make a law that legalized "marriage" of homosexuals. That's why I explained what happened in MY state and all of the Protestant churches who did exactly what the Pope did. Why aren't you condemning THEM?

So, you FAILED to show me where the Bible says that you're supposed to hate and ostracize your child if they are homosexual. And you're WRONG about what makes a person a homosexual. Like a heterosexual - a homosexual doesn't have to engage in sexual acts to be who they are.

It goes to show that YOU don't have a monopoly on lies. Gee - and I thought you put me one "ignore". Your obsession with me HAS to come to an end . . .

Sooooo, homosexuals DON'T have a right to be loved by their parents? WHERE does the Bible say that you're supposed to hate and ostracize your child if they are homosexual? The Pope was talking about families of ORIGIN - not families of procreation. As for his "support" of a civil union law...

Show me the quote - and the Pope. You can't because no Pope has EVER taught this.

First of all - Paul doesn't quote platitudes by Socrates or Buddha in Scripture. Scripture is the inerrant Word of Almighty God and is breathed out by GOD Himself (2 Tim. 3:16). As I showed you - it was MEN in the 2nd century who decided to EDIT Scripture and jettison Books that they no longer...

If not for your perverted, revisionist "histories" - your posts would be a LOT shorter. Time for another history lesson . . . YOU claim that for 1000 years, the laity could "own" and read the Latin Vulgate. This is absolute nonsense. For starters - the printing press hadn't yet been invented...

WRONG. As for Wis. 5:17-20 is an almost verbatim comparison of the armor of God Paul writes about in Eph. 6:13-17. Also - 2 Macc. 7:1-42 is the ONLY place you will read about the mother and her sons written about in Heb. 11:35. WRONG again. The minute YOU chose to accept Luther's decision...

Once again - YOUR version of history is as bizarre as your lack of faith in God's Word. Jesus DID, in fact give the leaders of His Church SUPREME\ME Earthly Authority, as I showed you back in post #99. He stated that WHATEVER they bound or loosed on earth would also be bound and loosed in...

Can you name ONE SINGLE Catholic doctrine that was "changed" by ANY Pope? As to your bogus claim that Pope Francis is "fine with same sex marriage" - show me the documented proof. HERE is a quote from him on a same sex "marriage" bill in Argentina: “In the coming weeks, the Argentine people...

This is easy to answer. A corrupt Pope doesn't mean that he TEACHES bad doctrine - anymore than a philandering Protestant minister does. Whatever they are in their personal lives can be polar opposite of what they TEACH. As for your friend - he can disagree with the Pope in matter of opinion...

Interesting. Time for another history lesson - AND a Bible lesson . . . First of all - the 7 Deuterocanonical Books that Protestants reject are referred to some 200 times on the pages of the New Testament. They were part of the OPEN Jewish Canon that existed until the 2nd century and were part...

That's about the weakest, most generalized argument I've ever come across when discussing this matter. NOT all of the examples I gave you have the same context - so your point goes right down the drain . . .

WRONG. The position of Apostle was successive. When they gathered to choose a successor (not replacement) for Judas - Peter stated the following, quoting Psalm 109: Acts 1:20 Let another take his office. The word used here for "office" is "Episkopay" (Bishopric). The Apostles were the first...

Do you adhere to a 39-Book OT canon or a 46-Book OT canon? Please tell me which one you adhere to and WHY.

YOUR version of Christ's Church doesn't exist - nor did He build it that way. First of all - Christ's Church has ALWAYS been made of imperfect people. He built His Church on 11 COWARDS and 1 DEVIL (Judas). What makes YOU think that His Church today would be filled with "perfect" people? There...