Search results

Nope - I NEVER said that. I said that the Protoevangelium makes this claim. Get your facts straight.

Yet you can't get any TWO of the tens of thousands of disjointed and perpetually-splintering Protestant denominations to agree on their interpretations of Scripture. Authority comes from Scripture and Oral Teaching - the Bible itself is CLEAR about this. Jesus told the leaders of His Church...

No - I just PROVED that you don't understand Scripture when it comes to Type and Fulfillment.

Now - tell me WHAT part of the following confuses you so I can hold your hand and walk you through it more slowly? What does the Bible have to say about the women standing at the cross and their children, who are called the "brethren" (Adelphoi) of the Lord? Matt. 27:56 says: "…among whom were...

I'm only interested in the Truth - which is a subject that YOU keep evading . . .

NOWHWERE is Mary named as their mother. In fact, I already showed you that another woman standing near the cross (Mary's relative) is their mother - and Alphaeus/Clopas is their father (Matt. 27:56, Mark 15:40, John 19:25). I also schooled you on the following facts ablut the use of "Adelphos"...

Moses was an OT Type of Jesus. Where does the Bible explicitly mention this?? Your ignorance knows NO bounds . . .

TRANSLATION: "Now I have BOTH feet stuck in my mouth." That's what I figured . . .

And you've already been handily corrected on this point - so why do you keep putting your foot in your mouth? The Teaching Authority of the Church had NOTHING to do with the sex scandal - ANY MORE than the teaching authority in YOUR sect has ANYTHING to do with the sexual sins of the leaders of...

Baloney. I've given you paragraph after paragraph of Scriptural evidence. Even if you reject it ALL - I have ALSO shown you the complete ABSENCE of any mention of Mary having other children. Scripture simply DOESN'T make this claim. So far - YOU haven't presented a SHRED of Scripture . . .

The WHY don't you show me the verse?? WHY are you so afraid to show me the verse that says MARY had other children if it exists??

Then, by ALL means - explain how . . .

Never called you that, either. I said your assertions were asinine - and they ARE.

Obviously NOT as ignorant as YOU. Jesus is FLESH and SPIRIT - He is both Man (1 Tim. 2:5) and God (John 1:1). He was ALWAYS God - even in the womb of His mother Mary. She conceived, carried and gave birth to Theanthropos - the God Man, Jesus Christ.

And now you inserted your other foot in your mouth . . . Show me where the BIBLE states that Mary was "only a surrogate" and NOT the biological mother of Jesus. Luke 1:31 And behold, YOU WILL CONCEIVE IN YOUR WOMB and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. You LOSE again . . .

"Adding"? Uhhhhh, you mean like YOUR claim that she had "other" children, even though Scripture doesn't say that??

I never called you "stupid" - I called you ignorant of Scripture, because you ARE. You keep insisting that Mary had other children - yet you can't show me where the BIBLE makes this claim. And ANYBODY who refers to Biblical type and fulfillment as "Code Ring Theology" is as ignorant of...

How can I "refuse to listen" if you haven't presented ANYTHING?? You haven't presented a SHRED of evidence about Mary having other children yet you expect me to believe this as "Gospel truth". NO WONDER why there are so many Protestant denominations . . . Sooooo - you reject all Biblical Types...

Then PLEASE show me where Scripture says that Mary had other children. If it's so "obvious" - then WHY is it that you haven't been able to show me?? PS - I also need you to STOP running and give a Scriptural refutation of the following comparisons between Mary and the Ark of the Covenant . . ...

Ummmmm, that's why I put the word brother in quotes (" "). This is a perfect example of why I said that you REALLY need to take some time off and learn the English language if you're going to attempt to debate people in English. You don't seem to understand how to communicate. A little less...