Search results

It is good to listen other posters so that you can take their criticism on board, if it is fair and honest.

You are proving my case. Do you think Jesus is coming to earth to engage in literal warfare with all these billions of wicked that have overrun your future millennium in a natural battle with the natural sword? No! It does not say that. He destroys them with the Word of His mouth. Your whole...

Do you literally believe Christ is coming suddenly and unexpectedly "as a thief in the night" as the Bible says (1 Thessalonians 5:2 and 2 Peter 3:10)? Do you literally believe the wicked will experience "sudden destruction" from His appearance as the Bible says (1 Thessalonians 5:3)? Do you...

They are. But Jesus is in heaven. Where is your Scripture in Rev 20 that teaches He is on earth?

Wolves that aim to harm the sheep will be destroyed by a shepherd. When Jesus comes He will destroy the wicked. You have no answer to that as all your avoidance around the Op proves. Your avoidance has become a pattern of your engagement. That is your MO. All is left now is a white flag.

Stop avoiding the issues. You obviously have a lot to hide. You are inventing 2 beasts where in reality there is just 1, all because your theology has crumbled apart today. That is why each post is contradicting the other. Your posts are as clear as mud. Let me go through these 1 by 1 to try...

Are you now saying that there are 2 beasts - 1 literal and physical, the other spiritual and figurative? It is hard to understand your writings. They are all over the place. They are totally contradictory. I do not think you have thought this out.

You cannot answer simple questions. That is because you are promoting error. Stop ducking around the obvious. The 7 heads actually belong to the beast, no other entity. Hello! You cannot even accept that. To do so would force you to abandon what you have been taught. This is not some 1-headed...

Oh really? Fancy that. A few minutes ago the beast was a real literal physical man. Do the 10 horns belong to the beast?

Do the 7 heads belong to the beast?

It matters little if the 7 mountains are Jerusalem, Rome or 7 other mountains. Your thesis is ridiculous. You are now avoiding every single argument that demolishes what you have been taught by Scofield. Tell us: is the woman sitting on these 7 mountains a literal woman - yes or no.

LOL. This is total nonsense, and you know it! How about actually explaining how the beast was before John and explain how a literal human can actually have 7 heads that represent 7 hills in Jerusalem. Your whole thesis is ridiculous. Contrary to what you have been taught, he is obviously not...

No. Your arguments are totally contradictory and unintelligible.

LOL. This is a joke. I never heard anything more ridiculous. The beast is supposed to be a literal person who has 7 figurative heads that actually represent 7 literal mountains in Rome and 10 literal kings? Your theology is getting more absurd by the second and your avoidance more pronounced...

Revelation 17:8 states, “The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast...

Hello! The seven mountains are the 7 heads of the beast. Stop being so belligerent and evasive. Revelation 13:1: "And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of...

... and you are yet to show us one single verse in Rev 20 where Jesus is on earth during the millennial period. That because it is nonsense. It is a figment of your imagination. Your teachers have taught you wrong.

Who do think you are with your infantile threats? You talk as if we care about these or take you seriously. Keep your foolishness to yourself. Your threats are a joke! People know the games you are playing. It is time to grow up and get real!

We hear a lot of talk today about a “rapture” of the Church before a seven-year tribulation. This popular end-time view in America was invented in the 1800s and is known as the Pretrib rapture. That doctrine teaches that there are two future comings of the Lord. The first Jesus comes secretly to...

So what are you alleging? Are you saying that there are no references in there to Christ's next return?