Search results

the lengths to which you will go to justify your judgment of another's soul is staggering . . .

That's what I thought.

"Current paradigm"?? Explain what that means and how it differs from Scriptural, cultural and linguist facts.

So, WHY would you place your eternal soul in the hands of somebody whose authority you are totally unsure of??

Another LIE. If there is some demon or principality behind what I say - he is NOT in Heaven and can't be "thrown out". You directed this damning statement toward me.

No - "tunnel vision" is what you have when you ONLY see a word and refuse to understand the historical, linguistic and cultural context. I already explained to you that the "named brethren" (adelphoi) of Jesus are NEVER shown to be the children of the mother of Jesus - but of the OTHER Mary...

So, you actually believe that your Protestant Fathers went through the decision process of deciding the Canon of the NT by skimming through ALL of the Books in contention. WHO were the judges?

Another LIE. Here are YOUR words: "I will be glad when you are finally thrown out of heaven, accuser."

First of all -= show me ONE verse of Scripture that says those in Heaven in the everlasting presence of almightly God are "DEAD". Secondly - we are told that the prayers of a "Righteous" person are very powerful (James 5:16). Those in Heaven have been made righteous and perfect in Christ...

Like I said - rationalize it ANY way you want. You condemned my SOUL. That has serious ramifications per Matt. 7:2. Good luck with that.

WRONG. the word, "Pray" is legal, juridical language that is used in police reports and court documents, where it simply means to ASK - to INQUIRE.

You keep dodging the question. I'm not talking about "historically worthwhile" - I'm talking about the Word of GOD. You believe that the NT is the inspired Word of God based on the authority of the Catholic Church. WHY is that?

You can try to rationalize it ANY way you want. YOU were condemning my soul - and THAT has ramifications, per Matt. 7:2 . . .

I already gave a Scriptural and linguistic refutation of all of this - which you were NEVER able to refute. So, why go on pretending??

Okay - but WHY do you accept the Catholic Tradition of the Canon of the NT?

Hey - YOU are the one who brought up the Deuterocanonical Books - although you referred to them as "Apocrypha". Don't blame ME for going off on a tangent. I merely questioned WHY you adhere to ONE Catholic Tradition - while rejecting the rest. That has EVERYTHING to do with this thread.

You ONLY grow tired of being caught.

That s something I would never dare to say to another human being because I fear God. Matt. 7:2 For with the judgment YOU pronounce YOU will be judged, and with the measure YOU use it will be measured to YOU. Good luck with that . . .

Apparently - you don't know anything about HOW the Canon of Scripture was decided upon. Not only were those 7 Books a part of the OPEN Jewish Canon until the 2nd century - AFTER Jesus ascended to Heaven and AFTER the destruction of Jerusalem - they are quoted and referenced some 200 times in...

Wanna bet?? In post #169 - YOU said: "Do you pray to God?" By ASKING me that - you PRAYED to me. As I have educated you before - "Pray" simply means to "ASK". "Worship" is a SECONDARY definition: Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary: Full Definition of pray transitive verb 1: entreat...