Search results

The fact that Paul rebuked Peter for his behavior doesn't negate Peter's infallibility in his teaching. Infallibility has NOTHING to do with personal behavior - that would make him impeccable, not infallible.

What on earth makes you think you're equipped to debate the Crusades when you've gotten every other bit of history wrong??

Why does the Archbishop of Canterbury crown the heads of Britain? Charlemagne was NOT a member of the clergy. You desperately need to STUDY history before posting again . . .

You're on a debate site. If you are going to make historically-bankrupt claims - then don't expect for people to cut you ANY slack.

Charlemagne was a ruler - NOT a Church official. READ your history. The illustration YOU posted is merely a depiction of his coronation - and NOT to the Papacy.

I don't watch 26 minute videos. If you can't articulate your point in a few paragraphs - you should reconsider spending time on a debate site.

Again - I'm not sure why you bring up Charlemagne. He wasn't a Church leader. And, by the way - the East-West Split came about in 1054. Once again - you've shown you complete lack of historical knowledge. I'm embarrassed for you . . .

Hey - don't blame ME for derailing the thread. YOU are the one who began spewing your perverted "history". All I did was call you out on it and expose you . . .

Rome wasn't "rewarded" with the Church. The Church turned the Roman Empire on its ear. It no longer exists because of the Church. You have GOT to study your history - and stop being so content to wallow in ignorance . . .

Saying that he has always BEEN a Democrat and is a Democrat NOW are two different things. He may HAVE been a Democrat for most of his life. He is NOW the most effective Conservative Republican President in U.S. history. I agree with you about the Republican Party in general - it HAS been too...

Uhhhhh, no. Whereas, SOME of your claims can be legitimized - this idea that the Democrat Party at ANY period in history was the “benevolent voice” of the minority and the downtrodden is nothing more that revisionist history. Your theory that the Republicans have recently moved more to the...

I am ALL for politicians crossing the aisle and working through compromise. That's what made this a great nation. However - the agendas of the two largest parties have become so polarized in recent years that they have made it almost impossible for this to happen on many important issues. I...

And I'M waiting for an example from history of the idiocy of what you just claimed.

This is a naive post. A candidate who has aligned himself with a particular party does so because they accept (for the most part) - the PLATFORM of that particular party. In other words, you won't find a staunchly conservative Democrat - just as you won't find a Leftist Republican. It's a nice...

You BURIED the Golden Rule when you chose to support the abomination of Abortion by voting for a demonic agenda. Don't look for "mercy" when you show NONE to those who are most vulnerable and innocent. Shame on ALL of you who support this abomination before God - then throw HIS sacred Word...

Like I said - your passion is horribly misguided - which is due to your total ignorance of Scripture AND history . . .

The utter stupidity of what you've said - especially the statements in RED show a glaring refusal to accept historical truth. And you're RIGHT - you don't look at names - and you also don't look at facts. A person as limited as YOU couldn't even BEGIN to understand the complexities of the...

No - YOUR issue is a woeful-ignorance of history and Scripture. You seem to have passion - misdirected as it is - but you lack knowledge . . .

And there you go again conflating "ROME" with the CHURCH at Rome. Pagan Rome and the Church IN Rome are NOT the same thing. This is nothing more than an exercise in ignorance on YOUR part. As for your other claims - WRONG on all points. Herod Antipas killed BOTH James AND John the Baptist...

I don't support those things either - that's why I'm voting to re-elect the President. By the way - what do you find that is "racist" about the Republican Party or the President?