Search results

No. You just fight with the actual literal wording of Scripture. You have to for Premil to fit. There are no survivors - as Scripture repeatedly states. You have no answer for that - apart from explain it away. After “the marriage of the Lamb” (Revelation 19:7), which is the glorification of...

Scripture tells us that we are coming back to earth, but I believe it will be a regenerated earth (Malachi 4:1-3, I Corinthians 15:50, 2 Peter 3). It will be an earth totally purged of all corruption. The new heavens and a new earth (in whatever form God chooses) will appear at the coming of...

This includes all mankind. Hello! You have to saturate your imaginary future millennium with billions of mortal rebels to support your error. In doing so, you must reject multiple Scripture that forbids this. Rev 19 is one of many passages that shows wholesale destruction. The first part of the...

So, it does not disappear. It is recreated? What does that mean? Is it brand new? There were no survivors. That is what happens when Jesus comes. Jesus said in Luke 17:26-30, “as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they...

You have totally missed the thrust of my post. You need to reread it.

LOL. That is a typical Premil move. Called by who "His Millennium rule on earth"? Invent an extra-biblical statement to support an an extra-biblical theory and then criticize Amils for not believing that extra-biblical theory. This sums up Premil! Where does it even say that in Rev 20? Nowhere...

Yeah right! Yes we do. The word is shepherd not rule. Read the original and you will learn. You are missing the crucial point. The word poimaino shows us that Christ is going to divide at the end between the sheep and the goats like a shepherd. You avoid the key destructive detail contained in...

Stop changing the subject please. Address the questions I asked!

So, this is the redeemed receiving their glorified bodies?

I will try again: What are glorified bodies? What are the supposed differences between "permanent incorruptible physical bodies" and "glorified bodies" in regard to their nature and ability? If the redeemed are not glorified at the moment, when are they glorified? Who are the camp of the saints...

This was a deliberate personal attack by you. You know in your heart what you intended by this. It was out of order. This is something like Derrick or Davy would write. I expected more from you. Are you willing to apologize for this?

My attacks are not upon you, they are on your theology and your mode of interpretation (or lack thereof). Now, will you actually address what I asked instead of always playing the victim?

Here you go again with your condescending questions. You normally do this when you have no counter-answer. Read my posts and you will get your answer - loud and clear. Now, will you address the posts and Scriptures above that you have swerved around that forbid your reasoning? Do you believe...

Exactly. So, we are not waiting for a future first resurrection. The first resurrection has already victoriously occurred. You totally missed my point above re "the last day." The wording in the original for “last day” is always identical – eschatee heemara. The Greek word eschatee used here...

The Bible shows the resurrection/judgment of the righteous and the resurrection of the wicked to occur on “the last (or final) day” of “the last days” when Jesus comes. Martha had a full awareness of that truth in the New Testament, when speaking of her brother Lazarus to Christ, in John...

You have no answers to God's Word. That is why you run. I was actually trying to dissect your theology but you couldn't even explain it in a comprehendible way with supporting Scripture. That is what you do. This is a sign that you do not have biblical support. Amils are the opposite. They...

You are now into Phase 2 of the Premil mode of engagement - ad hominem. The insults are a classic sign that you have lost the debate. John is describing a current reality in Revelation 20:6. It says, “Blessed and holy is he ‘that hath part’ (present active particle) in the first resurrection...

LOL. There is only one "first resurrection." Hello! That is common-sense. If there is another future victory over the grave then it must be the second resurrection. This is both biblical and logical. Whatever way you look at Premil it does not not add up. It is a non-corroborative doctrine. You...

This is a classic example of how you swerve around damning arguments for your theology. You sweep it all under the carpet and live in denial that the contradictions do not exists. This is not a profitable way to engage. It exposes your position. It shows us all that you have no answer to Amil...

Quite the opposite. Jesus is "the first resurrection" (Acts 26:23 and Revelation 20:6), "the firstborn from the dead" (Colossians 1:18), "the firstfruits of them that slept" (1 Corinthians 15:20), "first begotten of the dead" (Revelation 1:5). Nowhere does it call the future resurrection of the...