Search results

We can all talk however we want. That's not the point. The point is recognizing Jesus deceptive communication led to frustration on his part regarding his audience not understanding. One wonders what would be an indicator or poor communication if not that. For me not liking it, it is different...

Feminists showing "sympathy" at the plight of men by laughing at them.

This a a great vid on woman not really wanting a real man.

Yes. See post # 22.

What do you suppose the intention is in this case?

The funny thing about John 10:24 is Jesus did NOT come right out and tell them he was the Christ even though they directly asked him. Generally, I think this is very bad on multiple levels and can only be excused in one condition, war/duplicity. And I do believe that was the case with the...

Oh, what post did you express sympathy for the plight of men? And again with the quotes!

Feminism is so hypocritical! You want unconditional equality when equality is earned. Not unconditional. Which means, it's CONDITIONAL.

It is shocking how consistent you are in being unfamiliar with responsibility. Thanks feminism.

True but irrelevant. Ephesians 5 has different expectations for men and women. I believe we are commanded to do what is harder for each sex to do, men to love and women to respect. I explained to @Mink57 that God is a God of order and he ordained that husbands have authority over their wives...

I think Trump's relationship with Kamala is better than with Joe. In the 2020 debate, he said he entered politics because of Joe.

This is what the world teaches. The Bible teaches that both love and respect are unconditional. See unconditional verses in Ephesians 5:20-22 and 33.

No. The reason is the same, feminism.

I'm sure he meant most of those entitled feminists who make tic toc vids complaining about it.

Nope. The Bible says nothing about husbands specifically submitting to wives. The Bible specifically says wives - not should - but must - submit (unconditionally) to husbands. Also, you are ignoring the basis of this submission. All are to submit to each other out of love (reverence). Wives...

You keep denying that men are judged by masculine standards and women are judged by feminine standards.

Is the family destroyed? The evidence presented is destroying the family is the stated goal of the feminist group, NOW. (Female promiscuity is but the stated means to that end) Rather than recognize that evil for what it is, you resort of personal attack AS IF it is a matter of what I believe...

Lies. There you go again, pretending triumphing over feminism has anything to do with pretending only the plight of women matter. And you are certainly not showing sympathy toward the plight of men, which shows you still have not triumphed over the evil ideology of feminism.

Imagine a feminist lovingly responding to the facts from the post above on the plight of men ... Wow! Thank you for making me aware of the plight of men. I was always so focused on how bad women have it, I never realized how men have it bad also and we should all work together for equality...

That's your response to the WHAT to show sympathy to men for? LOL This thread is about over-coming feminism. When the conversation turns to showing sympathy for men, your gyno-centrism won't allow it. You only want women's plight open for discussion. Very sexist of you. I thought feminists...