Search results

One thing is not dependent on another. It's just as true to say if women doesn't want to be publicly abused, don't abuse men.

If that's what it takes to stand on the truth of Scripture, so be it. I'm OK with that.

Yup. Personal interpretation is what those who deny Mary had other children are doing.

It takes discernment to differentiate between figurative and literal language. While the Bible is a highly figurative book, it also contains literal statements of truth. That Jesus had brothers and sisters is one of those literal truths. There is another passage where Jesus rebukes his own...

Never have I heard this. The communist lingo is equality. Stick with your evil lingo. Be proud of it. IF feminism is about EQUAL RIGHTS than your objection is meaningless of public abuse, chauvinism and outright sexist disrespect and hate.

Do you know the difference between implying something compared to explicitly stating something?

Yes. Science. Objective measure. This is how you know feminism is a victim-mentality religion rather than a science based world view, it is impervious to facts. Imagine the feminist outrage if after a century of indoctrination evidence remained constant of public abuse, chauvinism and outright...

There it is! I’ve observed people tend to go one way or another regarding parenting: Exactly as they were raised. The exact opposite of the way they were raised. One thing I adopted from my father was to tenderly kiss my wife upon entering or exiting the house. You never no what might happen...

You can’t answer a question with a question. My question was about logic. Your question is about definition, which I already addressed in my quantitative post.

LOL. If he having brothers AND sisters does not imply Mary had other sons and daughters, what would?

Speculation. ‘Had to’ is also speculative. Seems to me, it was more a way to honor John as his trusted brother.

Another DEI with predictable results.

What is the protocol, the etiquette, for interacting with a divine vision?

Some things in the Bible are literal and some are figurative. It takes discernment to know the difference. Having said that, your claim is invalid. It is untrue to say that we should pluck out our eye. Rather, it is stated as a comparative; it would be better to pluck out your eye. This means...

I've gone back and forth on that. Now, I don't believe so. Rather who divinators claim is the dead are actually demons.

A beg to differ. It is taking it further for what is driving the movement to reclassify discipline as child abuse and a crime? And what is the fruit of that movement? I posted earlier that my ex-wife once said she thinks telling the teen girls "no" is abusive. Somewhat extreme lack of parental...

Exposing the anti-Biblical principle of "equality" inherent in feminism from today's devotional reading: Exodus 21:15 15 “Whoever strikes father or mother shall be put to death. So, while parents are commanded to strike the child (with a rod) to show you don't hate the child, for the child to...

That is false, proven by the fact that wars are won. It's so odd how believers here poo poo God's word, believing their own ways of thinking on the matter are superior to Gods.

No one ever said it would. More over-spiritualization. The VOICE renders Proverbs 23:14 as saving them from an early grave. You cannot seriously take the verse to mean NOT to impose discipline on children on the grounds that as the parent, you lack the power to keep them eternally alive.

I guess you have not read my earlier posts. Have you experienced getting caught in the rain? What to say to people who believe rain is a thing of the past?