Search results

I believe I explained myself well in the post just before this one...no. 309 You bring up Romans 1:17 many times. Paul was the bringer of the good news to the gentiles. The righteousness of God is revealed in the gospel because God is a right God and has kept the promise He made to Abraham ---...

Huh? Wait. I need another cup of coffee ! What I said is this: We become justified by God. We are born again and our spirit belongs to God. IF we sin, and we do, we have an advocate, as John stated in 1 John. Because we sin does NOT mean that we lose our justification. If it did, we'd be born...

Well then John 10:31-36 and John 10:13 are in conflict. And if the NT has conflicts then we cannot trust a word it says. Do you suppose there might be a solution to the problem? It's up to you to discover it. I have no more time for you. I wonder why you care to post to someone that knows so...

What makes you think I haven't investigated? Judge and jury? Yes. I maintain and insist on my right to believe you to be wrong in some doctrine or other. I also insist on my right to know what a Christian is and to know if someone is or is not a Christian. Just to be transparent, this does not...

Another post it and run. Gotta love it.

Anche te fratello. ♡

No! LOL We like to say Dormi bene .... sleep well Or Sogni Doro.... golden dreams = sweet dreams ♡

Yes Grailhunter. Agreed. I do believe I posted that we may have different beliefs but we are still Christian IF our fundamental belief system is Christian, which I think you agree with by your above post. If we don't believe Jesus resurrected, can we identify as Christian? This would be...

What's happening to my country?? :sleepy:

What you've posted above is simply not what Romans 14 is about. I'm not planning on convincing you and I hate to go on forever (as those who know me know well)... so we have to stop here.

The bible is not a bunch of verses. The NT is one whole and complete idea. It all has to be in alignment.... it all has to NOT CONFLICT. If there's a conflict, then something is not being understood. According to you Romans 14:23 conflicts with 1 John 1 and 2. This is impossible and a solution...

I wouldn't throw around the word CONDEMNED. The rest is in my post 283.

See my post no. 283. I have doubts. I'm sure you might. We're not condemned.

You gonna make me work at almost 10pm after a long day? OK. Chapter 14 Romans Verses 1-3 Welcome those that are weak in faith but not for the purpose of arguing with them. One might feel he could eat anything, while the other feels he should eat only certain foods. The one who eats should not...

It's OK GP This is how it is. You've got at least 4 persons right now telling you your understanding is incorrect... but you keep believing your version. It's just how things are. I do wish it wasn't like this....

Yes. I disagree. I could be IN SIN but still be in right standing with God. Are YOU saying that every time I sin I lose my standing with God?

Agreed Dan. I'm not the one you have to convince... The entire chapter has nothing to do with condemnation. We agree! :woohoo!:

No one said it refers to one's salvation. and @mailmandan is NOT always right !! But he's a nice guy so it's OK.

Just got back GP. No You said the verse contained the word CONDEMNED. Condemned means condemned and, as I've been saying, words are important. I was going to go over all of chapter 14 now but I see that @Johann and @Grailhunter have taken care of the conflict which, I THINK, might have been...

Not doing much reading these days. I did read The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah but many moons ago. Also, I like to understand what the bible says by reading the bible. One rule I go by is that it never contradicts itself. Some time ago I used to take verses members would post and go all...