Search results

We are dealing with someone who is blinded by his full preterist beliefs and falsely thinks that Jesus already came in 70 AD and isn't coming again in the future. It's just sad.

There's a lot of things you don't understand correctly, unfortunately. Yes, He is. This is blasphemous. You believe so many heretical things. Who taught you the nonsense that you believe, anyway? How do you interpret this verse... Romans 8:9 But you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if...

History, but I don't use scriptures like those as part of the foundation of my doctrine. I use clear, straightforward scriptures for that. Daniel is a difficult book to interpret in some places and I can't understand for the life of me why anyone would use those passages as part of the main...

Can you please address what I said in post #105 first before moving on to other scriptures? How do you reconcile your doctrine with what is written in 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3 and 2 Peter 3:10-12 which indicate that all unbelievers will be destroyed by fire when Jesus comes as a thief in the night...

Do you not understand that the Holy Spirit is also called "the Spirit of Christ"? Jesus said "I will come to you" in the same context as Him talking about the Helper/Holy Spirit coming to them. He was talking about the Spirit of Christ coming to dwell in them. Romans 8:9 But you are not in the...

Again, I agree, but if people are going to make false claims about what the ECFs believed, then that needs to be refuted or else some people will believe those false claims. But, I definitely would much prefer to just stick with discussing scripture.

Yep. It's quite clear. In direct relation to the Holy Spirit coming to abide in them, Jesus said "I will come to you". The Holy Spirit is also called "the Spirit of Christ" (Romans 8:9, 1 Peter 1:11).

Yes, of course it makes sense to a hyper-literalist like you, but where is the consistency in the symbolic woman sitting on symbolic things in Revelation 17 verses 1 and 3, but then somehow sitting on something literal in verse 9? There is no consistency in that. Do you care about that? Of...

So, you didn't know he is an amil? It wouldn't really make sense for any amil to believe in this date setting nonsense since it's pretty much exclusively a pre-trib thing. Anyway, it was just a misunderstanding and isn't a big deal.

Where is there any indication in the text itself that it's in relation to two events? Do you think the following is talking about two events? 1 Thessalonians 5:2 For you yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so comes as a thief in the night. 3 For when they say, “Peace and...

You obviously think what is in the videos might be true or else you wouldn't be sharing it. So, you are promoting it just by sharing it. The reality is that it doesn't deserve to be talked about with any credibility whatsoever. It's a clown show. How can you be impressed with someone who has...

But, your reasoning for doing that is ridiculous and is not the reasoning that Jesus had in mind for doing that. Also, I hope you are only joking about being left behind. If not, are you truly not sure if you are saved or not? If so, you should be spending time figuring that out and working out...

I agree with this, but the problem is that some Premils try to support Premil by saying that the forefathers (early church fathers) all or mostly believed in Premil and that is simply not the case. They didn't believe in modern day Premil as we know it. So, their misinformation campaign needs to...

I don't purposely ignore anything. Why can't you have more respect for me than thinking I would do something like that? You can't come to know the truth by ignoring things, so I ignore nothing. Your view is not based on scripture. You continue to just share your opinions with no scriptural...

I appreciate that you try to be thorough and I fully agree we should rely on the Holy Spirit for understanding, but you didn't answer my question about how you interpret 2 Peter 3:10-13. You say you think it is about two events, but I don't know what you mean by that.

It makes no sense to take the seven hills or mountains literally. The symbolic woman doesn't sit on literal things. She sits on many waters (Rev 17:1), which represent "peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues" (Rev 17:15). And she sits on a scarlet colored beast with seven heads and ten horns...

Or maybe he should stop taking the pills. o_O

You will reach no one with your full preterist heresy because we will continue to expose it.

Good grief. Look at this nonsense. People losing hope in Christ's return just because of their ludicrous beliefs that blatantly contradict scripture which teaches that no one knows the day or hour and that Jesus will come unexpectedly like a thief in the night. Pathetic.

That's for sure. No full preterist can be taken seriously just as no pre-trib can be. Especially those who buy into these ridiculous date setting clown shows and other wild speculation.