Search results

And as I've shown you - they're NOT.

If you can't refute my Scriptural proof - just say so. No need for name-calling . .

In other words, I caught you with BOTH feet in your mouth again . . .

For ONLY asa long as He cooperates with God's grace. It's ALL false and unbiblical - no matter WHAT you call it. "Eternal Security" "OSAS" "POTS" They're ALL man-made inventions.

WRONG. They will abide forever IF . . . They continue to BELIEVE in Him They continue to ABIDE in Him They continue to DO His will They continue to ENDURE in faith It's all CONDITIONAL on our cooperation.

You answered your OWN question with the verses you posted in your second response above. These verses are CONDITIONS on everlasting life. He that believeth in me . . . Whosoever abideth in him . . . He that doeth the will of God . . . He who endures to the end . . . When you CEASE to do those...

I see you're NOT big on paying attention - are you? I'm not sure HOW many time I need to define Epignosis or present scholary evidence on the meaning of Epignosis for you to understand the implications of this word. This isn't about what I think - it is a Biblical and linguistic reality that...

First of all – I never said that ALL of the people being written to in Hebrews were “saved”. I said that the WARNING in Hebrews was to those with an Epignosis of Christ. Furthermore – I have presented AMPLE scholarly evidence that my view of “Epignosis” is anything but “short-sighted”. MOST of...

You are completely dishonest – and that’s why discussions with you are fruitless. I challenged YOU and a few others here by giving you about 9 or 10 Scriptural refutation of OSAS. You never even attempted to answer them. ALL you did was to ask me questions about other verses. When I...

I’m not going to mock your Baptism because, as long as it was done in the Trinitarian formula per Matt. 28:19 – it was valid. I will say, however, that by your parents NOT baptizing you as an infant – they were doing things THEIR way – and not the Biblical way. The individual examples of...

No – we haven’t “moved past” anything. YOU’VE chosen to ignore the Scriptural reality of Epignosis. When I first brought this up – I guaranteed that NONE of you would be able to weasel your way out of the fact that the Word of God warns people with an Epignosis of Christ that they can fall away...

Is that YOUR rule – or is that how it is spelled out in Scripture? Baptism is the fulfillment of the OT type that WAS circumcision. As you know – 8-day-old baby boys were circumcised as a means of entering the Covenant with God - and were raised in the faith by their parents. As Christians...

I already addressed this point – SEVERAL times now. I told you that verses like John 5:24 are CONDITIONAL - when read in their proper context with other verses like Matt. 7:21, James 2:14-26, 1 Tim. 4:1, Heb. 2:1-3, Heb. 3:6, Heb. 3:14-14, Heb. 4:1, Heb. 4:11, Eph. 5-6, etc. YOUR problem – as...

I gave you John 3:5 from both PROTESTANT and Catholic Bible translations. You can't really be this dense . . .

And again – you FAILED to answer the question. I asked you WHO created the Catholic Church – and WHEN it was created. Remember, Einstein – YOU are the one who said it was “created by liars” – so SURELY, you must know WHO and WHEN. If you’re going to continue to dodge these kinds of questions –...

WRONG again, Einstein. In Acts 28, he never even implies that they know (Epignosis) Christ. The author of Hebrews uses the term “EPIGNOSIS” - which connotes a FULL, experiential and relational knowledge of Christ. You need to study your Greek . . .

And WHAT part of, “For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink (John 6:55) do you NOT understand? WHAT portion of “This IS my body”, and “This IS my blood” do you have difficulty with?? Can you point me to the punchline where Jesus says, “Just kidding!” Chapter and Verse, Einstein . . .

And yet other Protestants will tell you that He was speaking of the amniotic fluid during natural birth. The problem with BOTH of these explanations is the heavy emphasis on the transforming regeneration of Baptism that is so prevalent in the first 3 chapters of John’s Gospel. Chapter 1 – we...

Good grief - HOW many times do I need to give you the definition of "Epignosis"?? The verses I posted are directed toward converted, born-again believers - not non-believers. Asa I stated before - the word that NONE of you can get past is Epignosis, which is defined as a full, experiential and...

And until YOU can address the Biblical truth of how people with an Epignosis of Christ are warned not to fall away and LOSE their security - ALL of your out-of-context argument won't amount to a hill of beans.