Search results

I totally agree. There are numerous questions left unanswered. To answer them honestly would blow his theology out of the water.

There are multiple posts, Scriptures and arguments you have sidestepped above in order to sustain your claims.

Israel's king and kingdom has already come. Those who had eyes to see embraced Him/it. Sadly, those who had an temporal earthly ethnic territorial expectation missed it. That should be a warning to the many end-times "experts."

When is the end?

It is talking about the end of the world. Hello! This has not arrived. It is talking about the future return of Christ. The mystery of God will only end when we shall know even as we are known. That has not occurred. Stop forcing your heresy on God's infallible Word. Rev 10:5-7: "And the angel...

Bro, it is heresy. Only the blind reject the truth.

Time to put your beliefs to the test of repeated Scripture. Time to employ solid hermeneutics that will keep you within safe boundaries.

Bro, I totally understand. He doesn't seem to grasp the countless contradictions in his position.

Why would anyone take you seriously when you talk such nonsense?

That is it in a nutshell. But the onlooker can read and see the truth. They can also recognize the Premil avoidance. What else can the Premil do when they only have one text to build their speculations upon?

You have an inabity to address any other argument, outside of what you have been taught. Thankfully, others can think for themselves.

I am simply asking questions. Why are you so defensive? What are you hiding? So, are the OT saints part of the Church? This is not a difficult question.

So, basically, you have nothing. You are just promoting what you have been taught, not what the Book teaches. I already knew that. But, thanks for confirming that.

Only heretics deny the future coming of Christ for all His people and glorify creation. Anyway, if time is no longer, do you not use a watch or a calendar any more? You do not seem to understand the whole dynamic of time and eternity.

He has to. He has no answer. I have noticed, Premil engagement on these forums typically works like this: Phase 1 - avoidance. Phase 2 - ad hominem Phase 3 - run

I applaud you for that because that is a minority position among Premils.

Why can you not directly address the biblical arguments Spiritual Jew has presented instead of name-calling? P.S. Never criticize anyone about grammar when you cannot even spell the word "the" ("teh") in all your posts. That is duplicitous.

The issue is that you cannot support from Scripture what you claim in Rev. That is the core issue. That is what we oppose. I acknowledge that you do not promote this. But most Premils promote the rebuilding of the temple and restoration of the old covenant.

Who is arguing? That is what the text says. But we do not foist a fictional narrative upon Rev 20 to support our theology that the text does not teach. All this fantasy about Jesus on earth ruling with a rod of iron over millions of compliant mortals for 1000 years - where sin is essentially...

Exactly. It is the wilful misrepresenting that testifies that he struggles to pin anything on Amil.