Search results

It's not "clear" one little bit that is the context of John 1:1 - unless you read it into the text. How can anything BE something and WITH that same thing at the same time?

There is no truth in the above statement.

@Aunty Jane, it really needs to end there. As you can see, the original claim was that Churchiantiy doesn't teach ANY Biblical doctrine. And my reply shows that statement was untrue. You asked an unncessarily clarifying statement, which you agreed to the answer by writing 'OK.' It really...

Jesus is the way to eternal life.

It’s their theology that vexes you and not 1400 years of regressive brutalizing of 100’s of millions that vexes you?! Islam: The Politically Incorrect Truth What kind of person are you? Mughal India ~ The Biggest Holocaust in World History

LOL. Appealing to Strawman shows your logic is flawed. They are not the same because of how they are similar; they are different precisely because of the reason I stated. It is not because of my subjective opinion but an objective analysis of the text. YHWH loves us unconditionally while Allah...

I wouldn’t go that far! We all hold Jesus is the way, the life and the truth, right?

Yea, that’s what I meant when I said I would not refuse it.

Yup. Nothing about Jesus. How can a thing be WITH something and BE that same something at the same time?

At that time people began to invoke the name YHWH. Genesis 4:26

In that other thread, the poster cannot even bring himself to acknowledge God's name, let alone that Jesus' God is this God.

Welcome to the forums. This thread is diametrically at odds with the post in this other thread.

Of all the ridiculous things you've most, this rises to the top. Acknowledging and using God's name is how it is remembered and kept holy. Ex 3:15. Those who don't use God's actual name attack it. Ever watch Harry Potter? It's not supposed to be like "He who shall not be named."

An item suggests a material thing. An IDOL is anything manmade, including fame, fortune and conquest (of woman, business, nations).

LOL. The ethical issues regarding EOL do not pertain to plumbing or road construction. Of course it pertains to the medical profession!

I've answered this question multiple times already. You are not understanding what I am writing. We "play God" and should "play God" before and @ EOL.

LOL. Semantics. My position is consistent in us "playing God" by even having a medical profession whose entire mission is NOT to "let nature take its course." What I think is correct is to act on our God-given knowledge of Good and Evil. This includes active and passive euthanasia as a subset...

Yup. The truth is extreme. Right is extreme. Yes. No. Not sure where you are going with this. Hmmm. I have a fully developed philosophy of life. This means I've thought things through to the fundamentals. Regarding your apparent dichotomy between ideology and practical application in the face...

I've avoided this thread until now because it is more of the same concerning line of troubled thought. Your persistence suggests a desperation that I do believe is beyond human capacity to help. Yet, I feel prompted by the Spirit this morning. It's not the question but the attitude, the lack...

No! I am not cherry picking. The subject is NOT whether there are verses in Scripture where God says he loves certain action. The subject is why Allah is not YHWH. And the difference is there are verses in Scripture where it says God loves us (unconditionally). The same cannot be said of Allah...