Search results

The 6th seal is the wrath of God. Read the text. It totally demolishes the Premillennial scheme. It shows the conflagration and the destruction of all the wicked. This relays the Amil position. Let us look at the text in Revelation 6:12-17, says, “And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal...

That is the end of the world. It is the end of one of several recaps.

He does this in every thread he starts. He has no answer for Amil. He will likely start a new thread, as if this thread never happened. This is his MO. Avoidance, bullying and ad hominem are his only tools. He cannot engage in a Christian manner.

Where is a so-called future millennium mentioned here?

He will reign forever, not for 1000 years as you claim. This refutes your Premil claims.

Where you are getting confused is on the meaning of the binding. It is spiritual and not literal. It refers to the spiritual restraint placed on Satan since the First Advent through the ministry of Jesus. The Gentiles that were in darkness have now been enlightened by the Gospel. That is it...

Scripture expressly refutes your position. Revelation 12:5-11 says: "And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne. And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that...

You totally avoided every point and Scripture I presented. Premils must do this. This is how every discussion goes. You have no counter arguments because your theology is unbiblical. There is only one people of God, one Gospel, and one salvation. When do they mention your supposed future...

You are not going to bully any Amil here. Your childish private and public threats expose the folly of your position. You are ducking around the core issues that expose Premil. I will continue to highlight your blatant avoidance of the basic questions. Is this blood sacrifice arrangement you...

Is Jesus not enough for you Premils? He is for Amils! Hebrews 10:9-10 directly and explicitly nails the lie to this theory that men will be one day in the future be sanctified by the restoration of more the abolished animal sacrifices: “He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second...

Not so. Your posts are marked by avoidance and ad hominem. It is there for all the see. You have been unable to prove what you have claimed.

Every time your beliefs are exposed you do this. That is because your opinions cannot abide the Book. The reader can see how you cannot answer simple questions. The reality is, the cross has rendered your old covenant sacrifices redundant forever. You will never ever refute that.

Of course, you have no answer to my simple questions because this cannot be found anywhere in the New Testament pages. You dump all your old covenant dreams into Revelation 20 where it does not belong. Talk about manipulating Scripture. Talk about making the Bible say what you want it to say...

Not true. Quite the opposite. The reader can look back and see how you have ducked around every NT Scripture presented that forbids your error. You reject NT truth, explaining it away with your misrepresentation of Ezekiel's prophecy. Significantly, you cannot point us to one single reference...

When Jesus died on the cross He instituted the new covenant which allowed the believer to access God directly. No longer would the bulk of God’s people be excluded from the presence of the Lord by a veil. No longer did they need an earthly priest to represent them before God. They were now free...

Whose sins do youl think the Zadok priesthood need to make “sacrifices for” and what sinner needs additional intercession in the millennium in light of the presence of Jesus Christ – man’s only high priest and the ultimate and final sin-bearer and intercede? Was Christ’s sin offering not enough...

Rev 12 tells us that Jesus began His reign after the man-child Jesus was caught up to heaven after every enemy was defeated through and after the cross. Revelation 12:5 tells us: “And she (true Israel) brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was...

The longer you are on these boards the shorter and more evasive your posts get. That is because you cannot deal with the biblical facts presented to you. I refer you back to all the avoided evidence. You could not even find one single error in the Op.

You are the prime example of that. When your error is exposed (which is frequently) you resort to insults and ad hominem.

Once again you avoided every single text and argument I presented and defaulted to your usual personal opinions. This is why it is impossible to reason with you and this is why you run when confronted with the sacred text. This exposes your whole thesis. The reader will note who has Scripture on...