Search results

Yup - every Hebrew scholar in the world is "wrong" - unless they agree with YOU. That's the epitome of a man defeated . . .

By the way – ALL of the following Bibles and Biblical commentaries ALSO agree with Strong’s and Vine’s. But – I’m sure you’ll find issues with ALL of them as well . . . Benson Commentary Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary Barnes' Notes on the Bible Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary...

Ummmm, I gave you another source that concurs with Strong's. Now - tell me everything that's "wrong" with Vines Expository . . .

A Christian CHURCH. Not an offshoot sect like the Gnostics - but a CHURCH. A Christian, by definition is a Baptized person who believes in the Trinity, that Christ is both Man and God, was born of a virgin, suffered and died for our sins and rose from the dead and now sits at the right Hand of...

Just so you don't think I'm a poor sport - here is another source from Vine's Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testaments: Genesis 9:3 (In English order) כלEvery רמשׂmoving thing אשׁרthat הוא חיliveth לכם יהיהshall be לאכלהmeat כירקfor you; even as the green עשׂבherb נתתיhave I...

Then perhaps you can give me a list of the genuine Christian Churches that existed alongside the Catholic Church in the 4th century. This should be easy for you . . .

Of course Strong's isn't good enough for you. Nothing I present will ever be good enough because you simply can't admit when you've been defeated.

Ummmm, I DID cite a source. YOUR turn . . .

Nothing to hide. It is from Strong's Concordance with Hebrew and Greek Lexicon.

Uhhhhh, YES, He did . . . Gen. 9:3 You may eat any moving thing that lives. As I gave you the green plants, I now give you everything. כל kol Pronunciation: kole kole Definition: 1) all, the whole 1a) all, the whole of 1b) any, each, every, anything 1c) totality, everything or (Jer...

Your Scriptural ignorance is astounding. Christ was not a mere "prophet". He is the FULFILLMENT of the Law (Matt. 5:17) - which trumps any argument you have against "false" prophets. The entire Law and ALL of its legalities point to HIM (Col. 2:16-17).

Once again, my historically-bankrupt friend - as far as Christianity goes - there was ONLY the Catholic Church in the 4th century. Yes, there were heretical offshoots like the Arians, Nestorians, Donatists, et al - yet they ALL considered themselves to be Catholics. There simply was NO other...

Ummmm, I hate to break it to you - but as far as Christianity goes - there was ONLY the Catholic Church in the 4th century. All the lists that existed were FROM Catholics. For whom ELSE would this canon be?? This is what I mean when I talk about anti-Catholic revisionism and denial . . .

This history isn't "rewritten" - its simply denied by anti-Catholics. Every incident, Council and date I gave you can be substantiated.

Time for another history lesson . . . First of all - there IS an agreed-upon date of when the Canon was officially declared - AND closed. - The Synod of Rome (382) is where the canon was first formally identified. - It was confirmed at the Synod of Hippo eleven years later (393). - At the...

The entire point here is that you are painting Tyndale to be just an "innocent" guy who did the Lord's work. In fact - he did just the opposite by producing a flawed and heretical translation. By the way - do you even know when the Canon of the Bible was officially declared - and by WHOM?

Apparently - you didn't READ my post #3983, where I laid out the REAL history of what happened with Tyndale - not the homogenized Protestant version. While you're at it - maybe you should ALSO take a look at @Illuminator's postr #3986 for the names and dates of other vernacular translations...

Yes - "MY" smokescreen. The same one that I had to time-travel to hatch 2000 years go. Good grief . . . As the FULFILLMENT of the Law – Christ made CLEAR that the dietary and cleanliness Laws were NOT important to His followers: Matt. 15:10-20 “Hear and understand: it is not what goes into...

These were the SAME Judaizers. They weren't "2 different" camps. Their error was dealt with ny the Apostles, as I have already shown you. You are simply arguing in circles because you've LOST the argument.

Forum tip: The easiest way to run from an argument that you have lost on an online forum is to simply put me on "ignore".