Search results

Please note, you go like this when I expose your beliefs. You do not like that. That is where you respond with ad hominem. It is your beliefs that I reject. I also reject your mode of interpretation. Again, you do not like that being challenged. But I reserve the right to do that when you make...

Jesus actually applies it to the cross. How can you fight that? All because you will not let go of Premil. Of course, mankind will look upon Him when He returns. Do you deny that John 19:30-37 is speaking about the cross and Zechariah 12:2-3 to that - yes or no?

You are fighting with the Word. That is why you cannot take it literal. Once again, you ducked around the evidence above. You have to. It exposes Premil. John 12:31-33 forbids your thesis. You will never rip it out of the sacred text.

Jesus said in Luke 11:21-22, “When a strong man armed keepeth his palace, his goods are in peace: But when a stronger than he shall come upon him, and overcome him, he taketh from him all his armour wherein he trusted, and divideth his spoils.” Repeated Scripture uses binding in a figurative...

What happens at the coming of Christ occurs suddenly. It is totally destructive. I showed you the evidence. Is your tribulation period 1 year long after the second coming or is the 1st year of your millennium the wrath of God?

No. There is no such thing as your future "kingdom age." There are only 2 ages, this age and the age to come. There is no age to come after the age to come. That is more fake news. That is another invention of your own mind. Where does it state this in Revelation 20? I will not hold my breath...

Speak for yourself. Yes, in your false teaching, not in the teaching of the NT. Your teachers have deceived you. Premil has a big devil and a small God. Premil has a big devil and an impotent powerless church. Amils have the opposite. They have a conquering Christ who has empowered the Church to...

Yea right! There is such a lack of objectivity with you. There is no mention of the second coming in Rev 12. Where is it? Nowhere! You have to add unto Scripture to make it happen. Sad! John is talking about the ongoing warfare that involves the Church and Satan since Satan was actually cast...

That does not suggest the wrath lasts for 1 year. Premils do not even believe that. You are pulling at staws here. It is talking about the time of recompense has arrived. The wrath of God is sudden and totally destructive. No one survives as this passage tells us. I Thessalonians 5:2-7 the...

You see every passage through the lens of your faulty interpretation of Rev 20. That causes you to change the meaning of every end-time passage to suit your partiality. That is a sad, dangerous and unwise way to approach all Scripture. Revelation 12 places the defeat of Satan at the...

You are not just fighting with all Amils, you are fighting with the OT prophets, Jesus and the NT writers. You wrongly apply Zechariah 12 to the Second Advent rather than the First. “In that day” appears six times in that chapter thus indicating the harmonious nature of it. Matthew quoted from...

Hello! The binding of the strongman is the binding of Satan. All objective commentators accept that. The reality is: this exposes your theology and timeline, thus you have to reject it. Satan (the strongman has been bound since and through the First Advent. Satan’s will get a short season at the...

(1) There is a big difference between time and eternity, reigning for 1000 years and forever. Sorry you cannot see that. (2) The Messiah has already come 2000 years ago. He has already introduced His kingdom. Sad that you know nothing experientially and intellectually of this. Many here have...

Awwwh! I appreciate your encouragement. Thanks! Keep posting here. Truth is precious. It is uplifting. It is refreshing. It is inspiring. It is life-changing.

Hey. He is on our side. He is a solid Amil. I think you are misunderstanding his view. He believes what we do!

Good luck (and do do not believe in luck)! That is not how he works. He outlines error, that error is exposed, he then runs from the conversation without any retraction, apology or repentance.

Exactly bro! Well said! Premils do this on every biblical issue. Their whole doctrine is built upon sand.

I already addressed this in #57 and you already steered around it. You have to. I will repeat. Amils believe Ezekiel was a true prophet of God. But he mentioned absolutely nothing about some future millennium. Helooked forward to Christ and His final sacrifice for sin. The conditional promises...

Where is a millennium mentioned here? Nowhere. You are twisting Scripture to say what you believe. This is so wrong! With this type of convoluted hermeneutics you could literally make the Bible say anything you wish.

Why can you not tell us what covenant these blood sacrifices are under? Is this blood sacrifice arrangement you promote under the old covenant, the new covenant or a new old covenant? Why can you not tell us for what purpose they will be resurrected?