Search results

WRONG. Christ built ONE Church - not THREE (Matt. 16:18, John 17:20-23).

I never said that killing that Cathar and Albigensian heretics was the "right" thing to do. Howvere - these were matters of STATE. As for the veracity of the fact about their teachings - this is a matter of HISTORY, not "Catholic conspiracy" . . .

No - anti-Catholics do. You guys claim that Christ's Church failed (which means HE lied) - ALL because there were some bad guys in the Church, which he warned about (Matt. 7:15-20).

Yup. Modern scholars estimate that there weren't even 90 million people in ALL of Europe during this time. So the Inquisition would have wiped out the entire continent - and then some . . .

Here is one of MANY death blows to your Scripturally-bankrupt argument that the Church and the Body of Christ are two separate entities: Acts 8:1-3 And there arose on that day a great persecution against the CHURCH in Jerusalem, and they were all scattered throughout the regions of Judea and...

Your anti-Church, "anti-Body" rants were already destroyed in another thread by multiple posters - so why resurrect a losing argument??

And sadly - people like YOU can't tell the difference between Hollywood and reality . . . THANK GOD we still have Early Church documents like The Didache (Teachings of the Twelve Apostles) to compliment Scripture . . . Chapter 7. Concerning Baptism And concerning baptism, baptize this way...

Yup - so can the other tens of thousands disjointed and perpetually-splintering sects that ALL teach Him differently than YOU do. What a mess you've all made . . .

TRANSLATION: "I have absolutely NO way of refuting your Biblical or historical facts." That's what I thought . . .

Yup - they should have known that Christ only built ONE Church - not their tens of thousands of sects - or yours . . .

It ALWAYS cracks me up when an uneducated person blindly defends the heresies of the Albigensians and Cathars as ""genuinely Christian". As I already educated your fellow anti-Catholic, @Enoch111 in post #237 - the Cathars had multiple sects and had in common a teaching that the world was...

Yup - and until YOU can prove that your sect is completely FREE of sinners - you have zero room to speak . . .

SO angry . . . First of all - I was simply responding to the charge that we Catholics accuse you anti-Catholics of being "heters" when you simply point out historical facts. This is nonsense. If there is a point to be made in a debate - then there is a place for that. However - people like...

WRONG. If there is a point to be made - then so be it. However - if you're bringing it up just to sling mud, the it IS done for hate and nothing else. I could sit here ALL day and go on about the evils of what Protestant leaders have done over the centuries - but there is NO point in it...

And it's THIS type of dishonest post that causes a Catholic to accuse another of being "anti-Catholic". Your claims about Arianism are complete anti-historical nonsense. There were TWO Church Councils in the 4th century (Nicaea, 325 AD & Constantinople, 381 AD) that dealt with Arius's Heresy...

This claim is absolute unsubstantiated manure. I and others here have ALWAYS accepted the fact that we have had some unsavory characters in our Church's history. Christ WARNED that this would happen (Matt. 7:15-20). It happened among His OWN Apostles. What we object to is the false idea that...

WOW. Ellen G. White must be spinning in her grave . . .

Uh-huh. ALL of these verse show that "in the name of Jesus Christ" means "by His AUTHORITY". Oh, and by the way - NONE of these verses are about BAPTISM. Jesus said to Baptize in the name of the FATHER and of the SON and of the HOLY SPIRIT. This is the Authority of God.

Yup (Acts 1:20, 2 Tim. 2:2, 2 Tim. 1:12-14). Oh, uhhhhh, "LOL".

Yup - and their successors (Acts 1:20). You see - the Catholic Church has a UNBROKEN line of Apostolic Succession. YOUR sect can only go back as far as the 16th century - and probably not even that far . . .