Search results

Not so. It is to talk theological gibberish that doesn't make sense.

You talk so much out of total ignorance. Revelation 20 is simply talking about the enlightenment of the Gentiles after the first resurrection.

Satan gets a little season to wreak havoc on the Church. When Satan is released for a little season then so is the beast, and Satan's minions. We see the devils in Revelation 9:2-3, the beast in 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12, Revelation 11:7 and Revelation 17:8, and Satan in Revelation 9:10-11 and...

These verses align with Satan's little season. It is becoming clear, you not only have an ignorance of the symbolic emphasis of Revelation, but you also have no understanding of Amil. I would suggest you take a month out to study Amil before trying to refute it. This should could out the...

The difficulty with engaging with you is that you do not have a clue what Amils believe. We have to explain the elementary basics to you on every topic. You should actually start listening before running your mouth off as some pseudo expert on Amil. If you think Rev 20 is portraying a perfect...

Because Premills cannot rebut authentic Amil they have to invent strawman beliefs that they can shoot at. I take this as a commendation of Amil here.

It didn't to the Pharisees either, and look what happened. Your Jewish hope is misplaced. It is a figment of your imagination.

That period was introduced 2000 years ago. The Gospel has went out to the nations. There will not be a rerun of this age as you promote.

No. It occurs at the time that the current heavens are removed, thus forbidding Premil. Is the removal of the currrent heavens and intro of the NHNE at or after the millennium/Satan'slittleseason?

Let the Bible speak for itself.

Your teachers have misled you. The bondage of corruption is lifted at the second coming and the intro of the NHNE. You are building your theology on a misinterpretation of Rev 21-22.

When is that?

It just sounded like you were applying that to the First Advent.

But the redeemed do not receive bodily redemption until the second coming. Job was talking about that day when the current corruptible heavens shall be no more.

That 7000 years invented scheme you promote has been repeatedly proved to be a fallacy. No such thing as "Gods 7000 year Plan." It is Keras's 7000 year Plan. It is extra-biblical and anti-biblical.

You are so fixated with ethnic Israel and so obsessed with real estate in the Middle East that you miss who and what the Old Testament prophets were looking for. Even though the Old Testament explores many subjects, its grand overriding theme is Christ. In fact, the Messianic hope was at the...

You have so many false premises here, none of which you are able to prove, and all of them that have been strongly refuted over the years. Obviously, you just do not want to receive. You are married to your doctrine, and no one is going to shift you. Notwithstanding, the only reason I engage...

This sums up your theology! All end-time Scripture is viewed through the lens of Revelation 20. This is not a very wise way to establish any truth or doctrine. Take this highly symbolic passage that is located in the most obscure setting in Scripture out of the equation and Premillennialism has...

When in Revelation does the NHNE arrive - at or after the millennium?

OK, lets put your claims to the test: Where in Romans 15.12 does it teach a future millennium where the righteous will reign in glorious new bodies while earth's mortal will continue for another thousand years? Where in 2 Timothy 2.12 does it teach a future millennium where the righteous will...