Search results

God's name is YHWH - not "God." The silliness continues.

I'm reading a book now called No More Christian Nice Guy. It says the same thing; that churches have jettisoned the masculine and good Jesus for a feminized and nice Jesus, lacking any power of transformation for fear it might hurt anyone's delicate sensibilities. At my church, influence is the...

All of us would. The pain is from the walls Marks puts up to the truth of Scripture. Therefore, the fight is not logical but psychological. This thread has deviated wildly from “questions” for JW. The clinging to Thomas’ exclamation is amazing.

Valid things ARE being said. You’re just in denial of it. You don’t have eyes to see or ears to hear. There it is again! That smug arrogance that others benefit from your inherent awesomeness while you are incapable of humbly benefitting from what us miscreants say so that YOU may take it to...

IDOLATORS cannot admit this last part. If only you rely on extreme Eisegesis …

Talk about deflection. It’s not the topic, you offended me! Unbelievable. In logic, this is called Ad Homenim. No matter how ‘horrible’ our style and manners are, you can put on your big boy doctrinal pants on and discuss it, including honestly answering probing questions that reveal the...

Such is the nature of IDOLATRY. So very common in Christiandom, a hallmark is they cannot admit any weakness to their belief. An open mind on say, something political, can admit for Proposition A, there are legitimate arguments for and against and after careful consideration, they come down on...

No deflection. And I never get over your refusal to discuss the subject honestly, such as actually answering questions. It is a real tell.

Yup. That’s were you lose me. Critical errors you make.

That was not my question. Obviously, you just want to repeat your mantra that contradicts what Thomas actually said (which was an exclamation) AND not answer my question. Your silence speaks volumes.

Because of the IDOLATRY associated with this translation, you will never get them to concede the translation is not divine.

Because there is no actual teaching of their doctrine, they must resort to doctrinally investing in ambiguous text. The more ambiguous, the more it serves their doctrinal purposes. Yes, Thomas exclaimed upon seeing the risen Lord. Who wouldn't? By contract, there is explicit Scripture that...

Never read Job huh?

Exclamations are anything but sloppy and irreverant speech. And it is no assumption or answer to my question. What set of circumstances would you accept one is making an exclamation if not seeing someone come back from the dead? :eek:

I'm pretty sure you know exactly what I'm saying. What does this verse mean to you? Whoever blesses Israel will be blessed, And whoever curses Israel will be cursed. Numbers 24:9

One wonders when you'll get your fill of antimsemitism, hating Jews?

Youre unbelieable. If true, there is no reason to use the KJV.

This has been debunked numerous times. THROUGH is not BY.

Sure he was. I wonder what set of circumstances would you accept one is making an exclamation if not seeing somone come back from the dead? :eek:

I often have to remind some folks that Jesus did not speak the King's English.