Search results

Just read this in the chapter I’m reading of No More Christian Nice Guy. He calls the practical, of the soul.

I meant to reply to this when I read the post last week. President George W Bush referred to this as the soft bigotry of low expectations. What expectations did you have of yourself? Ever compete? In my Senior year of Indoor Track, my 4 x 440 team competed at State wide competition, placing...

Huh?

My wife and I saw this episode in the movie theater and again last night. Powerfully delivered. The actor who plays the Pharisee who hates Jesus did an outstanding job. In his pronouncement, I reflect in this thread. The Chosen does such a good job of bringing the Scriptures to life on a human...

No. Your turn. Why does Jesus say in John 17:1-3 that his father, YHWH, is the only true God if that is not true?

I’ve answered numerous times. Your turn.

<sigh> The cause of wrong doing is not society’s concern but the action, the effect. What if it came to light that rapists and pedophiles and murderers had a hormonal imbalance; should victim laws all be repealed? Biology. Politics/law. Not the same thing.

So funny that you cannot answer questions.

For those legal experts out there who see no issues for appeal, consider this. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/yale-law-professor-shreds-trump-verdict-says-serious-constitutional-problems

Reason says this! I’ve long held the proper order of analysis is: Public policy position. If equal, go to step 2. Resume. Track record of success in implementing above public policies. If equal, go to step 3. Personal integrity. If equal, go to step 4. Like ability. Demonrats attempt to...

Every argument against Trump is a distraction from PUBLIC POLICY. Public policy is the #1 criteria. Everyone knows this. Therefore, the Left tries to compensate for lack of substance with shrill emotion in pretending secondary things matter more. Nationalism. As Americans, that must be our...

Deny your statements that YOU have not seen appeals issues all you want.

You are a joke. Successfully fooling yourself.

No. I will not take your fool's errand to convince you what you've already decided is not the case.

Wrong! "We" have seen tons of appealable issues. It is you, who chose to be blind, who do not "see" them.

It’s been common knowledge for decades. What is becoming increasing clear is that you are less a victim of the propaganda and more complicit with pushing the narrative.

Here is where your understanding of reality is distorted. Most people are aware that courtrooms are the one place you are most likely NOT to hear all the evidence. It’s not that the jury heard evidence the public knows nothing about. Rather, the public is shocked by jury’s verdict only to find...

TLTR Oh boy. Could you simply articulate: 1. Baseline understanding. 2. Correct understanding. And possibly. 3. Why 5,000 baseline understanding is incorrect. 4. Why new interpretation is correct. (Again, in a simple and concise expression) An increasing # of threads seem to not express...

Why are you disregarding the verses in chapter 4 & 5?

Where does this come from specifically? And what is the significance of the claim?