Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. Wrangler

    A Question for Jehovah's Witnesses

    Greek influence of the god Phoenix. Inherently contradictory, like square circles. What is so odd is how they make this IDOL, completely absent from Scripture, the central message. It’s so odd!
  2. Wrangler

    Trump ~ guilty

    In my capacity as an individual who happens to be a Christian, of course forgiveness is required. In my capacity as a citizen who has witnessed my country lower to 3rd world banana republic prosecute political opponents, justice is required. Pay day is coming soon.
  3. Wrangler

    Trump ~ guilty

    Always with you, it is invoking one logical fallacy after another. Where do you get off limiting a rigged trial to only a rigged jury? Appeal to Strawman.
  4. Wrangler

    Trump ~ guilty

    He canpaigned to win his office on “getting Trump.” Might that qualify as more than an assumption of pure political motivation on the side of the New York DA?
  5. Wrangler

    Trump ~ guilty

    Making a martyr out of Trump. Great idea!
  6. Wrangler

    Trump ~ guilty

    Wrong. We are not just Christian’s. We are citizens with duties that come with that, particularly being involved in politics. The absurdity is who is left to publicly serve if not Christian’s? Satanists are better with power?
  7. Wrangler

    Trump ~ guilty

    I read your denial but can’t find your acceptance criteria. Picture a verdict made by jurors taken from Obama’s campaign staff. Are they more likely or less likely to acquit Obama than an otherwise impartial jury? Not sure what qualifies in your head as ‘rigged’ but this was if any trial was...
  8. Wrangler

    Trump ~ guilty

    Poisoning The Well. Moving the goal posts. Your opinions are impervious to facts.
  9. Wrangler

    Trump ~ guilty

    LOL. Then what purpose did it serve to issue the gag order?
  10. Wrangler

    Trump ~ guilty

    Many Black people see it everyday for generations. Guess you do not have eyes to see.
  11. Wrangler

    Trump ~ guilty

    That was a fair trial, except; Except … There Was No Crime. Paying someone not to talk is not a crime. Statute Of Limitations Expired. Even if there was a crime. Prosecutorial Abuse of Power/Overcharging. The allegation of business misrepresentations is, at most, a mistake. It should be...
  12. Wrangler

    Trump ~ guilty

    You mean we have the Spirit of God that guides us in all truth but God our Father is to remain a perpetual mystery? I’ll start a separate thread on this.
  13. Wrangler

    A Question for Jehovah's Witnesses

    One of the things that I realized is undeniable is the theological argument. The reason Jesus cannot be God compared to the reason it is claimed he must be. The must be pulls out of the air that by no other means could all the sins of the world be covered. That's it. That's the basis. This is...
  14. Wrangler

    A Question for Jehovah's Witnesses

    Trinitarians must reject context to support their idol.
  15. Wrangler

    A Question for Jehovah's Witnesses

    Acts 2:36 God has made Jesus both Lord and Christ. NOTE: Jesus did not make himself Lord and Christ. Who made Jesus Lord and Christ?
  16. Wrangler

    Self Control

    It's human nature. One of the most wrongly held views in Christendom is the notion that we are not to judge others. If one studies, the admonition is to not be a hypocrite, to judge consistently. Having said that, we must be mindful of preliminary or superficial opinions we draw about others...
  17. Wrangler

    Trump ~ guilty

    Agreed.
  18. Wrangler

    Trump ~ guilty

    It was a forgone conclusion. It will be appealed and the judge sanctioned.
  19. Wrangler

    A Question for Jehovah's Witnesses

    Nope. “Jesus” is nowhere to be found in Isaiah 9.
  20. Wrangler

    A Question for Jehovah's Witnesses

    Nope. Supposing so is an egregious abuse of language usage. Subjects of a sentence. Objects of a sentence. Not equal. No rational person would take “I gave the book to him” to mean “I” and “him” are the same person. Now, back to the question. What verse says what you claim?