Search results

The only way your argument survives is by avoiding the counter evidence that forbids your beliefs. Revelation 10:5-7 says of the Second Advent and the concluding last trumpet, “And the angel which I saw stand upon the sea and upon the earth lifted up his hand to heaven, and sware by him that...

Was Jesus the Creator - yes or no?

One and a thousand are also brought together in a metaphorical sense in Psalm 84:9-10 to represent a similar illustrative thought as that of Deuteronomy 32:30. Using a comparable idea, although applying it to a specific measure of time, we learn, “Behold, O God our shield, and look upon the face...

We are in Rev 20 since the first resurrection of Christ. There is only one resurrection day and one judgment day. Nowhere teaches multiple of these.

Revelation 19:11-16 makes clear, “And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man...

How about reading what I wrote. It is yet future!

When He returns at the end.

Jesus said in Matthew 24:35-44: “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as in the days that were...

But the Op is presenting an Amil argument. He believes in a future coming of Christ. Can you not address his argument?

Armageddon is not even mentioned there. You force it into the text to support your error. This again shows us that Premils are not literalists, only when it suits their theology.

Genesis 13:14-15 tells us: “And the LORD said unto Abram, after that Lot was separated from him, Lift up now thine eyes, and look from the place where thou art northward, and southward, and eastward, and westward: For all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed for...

Why can Premils not quote the texts they are presenting?

I gave you the evidence. Time terminates at the last trumpet. Stop fighting with the text. You are fighting with that in order to sustain your error. Chronos is a duration of time. It is a measurable period in between two particular events. The King James Version New Testament Greek Lexicon is...

No, Amils are looking for a perfect arrangement that is delivered from the bondage of corruption not another age like this one that is plagued by sin and sinners, deception and being deceived, crying and dying, disease and decay, war and terror, Satan and his devils as you argue.

Where is your evidence in Revelation 20 or anywhere else in the NT that Abraham, Israel or us is going back to the old covenant geographical boundaries? All i see is your opinions in your posts. This is a common trait in Premil writings.

Hebrews 4:1-3 says, “Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it. For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it...

So, where do you get all this in Revelation 20? It seems like you are taking your theology from the Left Behind novels. Who are the billions of wicked then that overrun your supposed future millennium in the future if this is a time of perfect bliss?

Maybe you would quote the passages you are referring to. There is nothing in the post I responded to, apart from your personal opinion. Please present your evidence.

Exactly. He is going to shepherd the nations when He comes. He will divide the sheep from the goats. What is so difficult about that? That is pretty easy to grasp. Then He destroys all that are not His. Why do you constantly deny the obvious? No one survives in Revelation 19. You are fighting...

I have refuted all this for years. BTW, why do you deny the deity of Christ? That is heresy and blasphemy!