Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. W

    Question: Why not believe in Christ's millennial reign on earth?

    Christ and the New Testament writers only recognize two overriding ages in their teaching – “this world/age” and “the world/age to come.” One is current, corrupt and temporal and the other is impending, perfect and eternal. One refers to mortal life on earth in the here-and-now, and the other...
  2. W

    Question: Why not believe in Christ's millennial reign on earth?

    Have you corroboration for your opinion of Revelation 20? Please submit. Where else teaches this additional age in-between this age and the age to come?
  3. W

    Another Premillennial absurdity

    Revelation 20:4 says, “Blessed and holy is he that hath part (present active particle) in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be (plural future middle indicative) priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign (plural future middle indicative) with him a...
  4. W

    Another Premillennial absurdity

    The word in the original (which it was written) is "shepherd" not rule. The original Greek in Revelation 19:15 states “he should (patasso ho ethnos kai autous poimaino autous) smite the nations, and shepherd them with a rod of iron.” The coming of Christ is not to high-five sin and mollycoddle...
  5. W

    Another Premillennial absurdity

    What does the word "rule" mean in the original Greek? Where does it say that this is future? Every other Scripture depicts the second coming as the end. Where does it say that Jesus is on earth in Revelation 20? Where in Revelation 20 does it say that Jesus is ruling with a rod of iron?
  6. W

    Another Premillennial absurdity

    Christ is the fulfilment of the OT type. Your fixation with Israel causes you miss the biblical focus on Christ.
  7. W

    Another Premillennial absurdity

    So, you a Pretribber?
  8. W

    Paul claimed 3 times that Revelation 20:4 was a current reality.

    Bro, I totally totally agree. It is obviously frustration. When you have the truth you can have a confident in that truth. When you do not, you have to constantly hurl ad hominem to cover for your error. Their pattern is to explain away the fuller revelation of the New Testament away by their...
  9. W

    25 questions that prove that ancient Chiliasm was a different animal to modern Premil

    You normally get vicious and bitter when you have no answers, which is often.
  10. W

    Paul claimed 3 times that Revelation 20:4 was a current reality.

    Why are Premils on these forums so nasty and vicious? You undermine your cause and lose credibility with your insults.
  11. W

    Paul claimed 3 times that Revelation 20:4 was a current reality.

    We should never have to convince a professed evangelical of this. This is another reason why Christians should reject Premil. Why would they not invent 2 new covenants ( One for the redeemed and 1 for ethnic Israel) when they do it with everything else? They have 2 bindings of Satan, 2 last...
  12. W

    Paul claimed 3 times that Revelation 20:4 was a current reality.

    With Premil it is as if Jesus never came or paid the final sacrifice for sin.
  13. W

    Paul claimed 3 times that Revelation 20:4 was a current reality.

    Read what is written and how the NT teaches not how you have been taught.
  14. W

    Paul claimed 3 times that Revelation 20:4 was a current reality.

    One of the greatest mysteries in this Book is that an omnipotent, omniscient (or all-knowing), omnipresent God forgives and forgets. To think that God erases our sin, guilt and failings from His remembrance is totally overwhelming. Spurgeon said in a message The Friend of Sinners, "Where, then...
  15. W

    Another Premillennial absurdity

    This makes too much sense.
  16. W

    Paul claimed 3 times that Revelation 20:4 was a current reality.

    We have already answered that. You keep ignoring that.
  17. W

    22 major reasons to abandon the Premil doctrine

    Agreed bro. Happy Thanksgiving.
  18. W

    Paul claimed 3 times that Revelation 20:4 was a current reality.

    Not so. Quite the opposite. The best way to shed light on any challenging or figurative passage is to bring other relevant passages unto the table and interpret Scripture with Scripture. This removes theological speculation and any need for private interpretation. In understanding the...
  19. W

    25 questions that prove that ancient Chiliasm was a different animal to modern Premil

    The whole doctrine from beginning to end does not add up.