Search results

I like this. Read the psalm verse in context.....the human messiah was told to be a king. Hebrews says what it says.

Read the posts

No, I think there is a difference between doing it and allowing to be done. Hmmm? Crucified in the womb? Interesting belief. Again you are referring to a verse that the Jews love and it points to a human. Yeshua was not interested in "spoils" This verse is referring to a victory by a human...

Romans 8:1-3 Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, 2 because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit who gives life has set you free from the law of sin and death. 3 For what the law was powerless to do because it was weakened by the flesh, God did by...

I tell you what, if you can come up with an Old Testament prophecy that says the Messiah would be the Son of God....then you will have something. But then if that were in the Old Testament, the Jews would not have rejected Yeshua.

That is true. But Yahweh did not nail Him to the cross. Allowing Him to be crucified is a lot different than He actually doing it. The term crush....is about someone else, crush is not crucified. A prophecy about Yeshua would include the word crucify...don't you think that Yahweh would know that?

I didn't have to....Yahweh did not crush His Son. The verse is not about Yeshua.

Yet it pleased Jehovah to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see [his] seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of Jehovah shall prosper in his hand. But the LORD was pleased To crush Him, putting Him to grief; If He would...

Yeap!

No I got it right in one. Most definitely the Son of God and most definitely a full fledged God.... But there still few thing He was called....Lamb of God....Immanuel....Emmanuel.....Messiah....Savior....Yeshua.

LOL

Translation wise...I would go with sinful flesh. What the flesh wants...natural desires...In that the natural man would do things that would be considered a sin from the Christian perspective. Without God, there is no reason for the natural man to be concerned about sin. The flesh is not...

So to answer the OP…. Yeshua did not have a sin nature and we do not have a sin nature….. because there is no such thing as a sin nature. This phrase is not in the Bible and like many of the false theological MANufactured words and phrases it is not biblical. Its only function is to condemn and...

Get back to the topic...quit nagging

Telling the truth is arrogant.....? LOL You just do not like the truth. Now...has anybody told you that you are like a nagging wife? Get back to the topic.

Exactly, that is why I when I explain things it is neutral.....It is not stern or nicey nice. Just matter of fact.

LOL....It is not what you say....it is how you say it! But the thing is I am not saying anything.....I am writing it......and all I get back is whining. I do not explain the truth and then write....and that is it, you dirty rotten scoundrel! You could challenge me? But nooooooo! I don't like...

Still, a lot of words but it comes down to a whine.....I don't like it when someone is smarter then me! Christianity and the Bible do have some things that are mysteries.....but mostly if you remove the false beliefs and man-made sins it is very straight forward....One of the most awesome...

My ministry is the Johnny Appleseed of truth. Arrogant?....Gee I have never heard that before....LOL. If you know as much as I do...it is hard not to come acrossed as arrogant....That type knowledge instills a certain amount of confidence. If I explain why, it sounds like I am bragging. So I...

Most of you will remember that after God created / made Adam and Eve, they were naked and He did not want them to know the knowledge of Good and Evil….Now that is a full topic….Why do you think that Adam and Eve formed a marriage and God told them….Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth...