Search results

See Post 821.

A or B.

I want to know if your answer is A or B.

You fancy yourself the savior? And if did not escape my notice that you didn’t answer the question.

Do you feel some kind of victory in making such a statement. What is better? OPTION A. A denomination embraces constant learning and changes based on new information. OPTION B. A denomination that rigidly holds fast to ideas proven to be incorrect Please answer A or B. Thanks.

I am Spirit anointed but do not believe I am part of the 144,000. I’m only a 2nd class Christian. But I thank God for choosing me, warts and all.

Projecting. It’s something you should have learned in elementary school. One can easily educate oneself that O’ means OF in English. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/o%27

Yes, it is, since we are reading English and that is how it translated. It is you you must resort to reading something else into the translation.

Right! Its called Language Usage.

His words were purely exclamatory. When I drop my toast butter side down, I am not literally stating it is feces. You don't need expertise in ancient foreign languages to know an exclamatory statement when you see one. Also, it is not a narrative declaration. Saying someone is their God does...

Cultural Marxism and intersectionality is ultimately cannabalistic and doomed to fail.

I've never agreed more with you!

Yes. O' is an abbreviation for OF. No one is denying Jesus is OF God - servant, apostle, priest, word, lamb, Anointed, etc. If you check grammar, you'll discover that OF does not mean a kind of is. Joe Biden OF Maryland not to be taken to mean Joe Biden is Maryland.

Huh? I was addressing the masses, just an exclamation, like "duck!" When I say, "duck" I don't literally mean the person I am talking to is an aquatic bird.

Why would you take this to mean he is not referring to 2 Beings? I said “my mother and my father.” Obviously, I am referring to a mystical multi-person Being but for reasons unknown, I neglect to mention others persons associated with this multi-person Being.

Appeal to Diversion. Your question has nothing to do with the "by" v "in" Christ discussion. And your question was already answered by @Keiw in 711. Again, your claim is false and repeating it does not make it true. And when he again brings the firstborn into the inhabited world, he says, And...

No. They are not attacking the Bible just an idol common in Christendom wholly absent from Scripture. Read my signature for clarification.

Chosen or elected is what I said and what Scripture says we are. Is that the same as anointed, in your view?

Jack don’t need no specific examples. Sweeping generalities is sufficient for the indoctrinated. JW’s are guilty by accusation! How many times do you have to be told? :pfite:

What you are saying is demonstrably untrue. I showed an English translation that is ‘in Jesus’ not ‘by Jesus.’ And most are that way.