Search results

Apparently you don't understand how a debate works. Allow me to educate you . . . The name of this thread is "Virgin Mary Had Other Children After Jesus". Therefore - it is up to all of YOU to prove this statement - NOT up to us to show that she didn't have children. The absence of any...

Unless YOU can show where Mary and the Saints in Heaven have been "kicked out" of the Body of Christ - they are STILL IN the Body and not "dead" as you falsely assert. NOT that difficult to grasp . . .

And once again (LOL), "they" haven't proven that they were Catholics (LOL) because they can't get their story straight (LOL).

WRONG. I am more than willing to hear evidence that Mary had other children. Unfortunately - NONE of you has been able to present any. Can YOU me something that says she had other children?

Sooooo, can you show me where the Bible says that Mary and the saints in Heaven were kicked out of the Body of Christ?? Chapter and Verse, please . . .

Sure they are. EVERY anti-Catholic is an "expert" at being dishonest. Oh, I almost forgot - uhhhhh, "LOL" . . .

Interesting. Now - as a Sola Scripturist - surely you can show me where the BIBLE makes this claim. Chapter and Verse, Einstein . . .

Suuuuurrrre. That's why you keep leveling the same moronic accusation - without proof . . .

Yet NONE of you has been able to prove this from Scripture. The demand to prove everything fro Scripture is a Protestant phenomenon. I would be satisfied if one of you could even show me an extrabiblical account of Mary having "other children" - but you can't even do that. Did it ever occur to...

Yet, not ONE example. Like the old saying goes - "Empty barrels make the most noise" . . .

Wow - THREE exclamation points (!) and an "LOL" to boot . . . Your psychotic rant aside - MOST anti-Catholics I come in contact with who claim to have been "former Catholics" are the most ignorant of ALL when it comes to Catholic teaching. They assume most of what they say is correct based on...

Actually - you haven't been able to point to a SINGLE instance - which is in itself a lie. Good job . . .

And that's the difference between a Protestant who simply "disagrees" - and an anti-Catholic. A Protestant who simply "disagrees" with Catholic teaching makes sure he has the facts that he is arguing against. An anti-Catholic won't check his facts and simply argues with the worst rumor he can...

Nope - 2 wrongs NEVER make a right. Just showing you the hypocrisy of your post that even though the sex abuse problem is rampant in your OWN back yard - you still have the nerve to point fingers in everybody else's direction. Jesus spoke well of YOU when he said: Matt. 7:3 Why do you see the...

That's funny. The Catholic theologian and apologist, Dr. Scott Hahn, has a PhD - and I can name a DOZEN others Do you have same "respect" for HIS doctorate and HIS findings as you do everyone else's??

Your statement above in RED is the first correct thing you've said in this entire thread. Dishonesty IS stating a lie - and every time your fellow anti-Catholic @Paul Christensen makes a FALSE claim about what the Catholic Church teaches - it is a LIE. When you agree with him - you share in...

Oh, and that "NEVER" happens in your Protestant circles - does it . . . Blogger Who Exposed Protestant Sex Abuse Cover Up Sued By Her Pastor Denial About Sexual Abuse In Evangelical Churches Southern Baptists Apologize For Sex Abuse Coverups Confronting Evangelical Enabling of Sexual Abuse...

I think you got your arguments mixed up. I was defending my statement that NOT every student learns what a teacher WANTS them to learn - no matter HOW good the teacher is. Some students are just bad students.

Your statement above in RED again proves my point that you're an angry anti-Catholic. If you weren't - you wouldn't have posted such an asinine statement without admitting the SAME problem exists in your own dirty little backyard . . . Evangelical Sex Abuse Record ‘Worse’ Than Catholic, Says...

The most comically-ignorant thing about your post above is the idea that there was ANYTHING that was considered to be "extra-Biblical" by the 4th century. Ummmmm, there WAS no Bible until the 4th century, Einstein. Time for another History Lesson . . . - The Synod of Rome (382) is where the...