Search results

The Son is BOTH Human AND Divine. NOT that difficult to grasp - for a person of faith, that is . . .

In other words - you can't refute the linguistic facts I presented that DESTROY your position. That's what I thought . . .

Apparently - you didn't read the disclaimer: "CatholicProphecy.org features prophecies from various saints and mystics. They are all thought to be accurate translations and accurate quotes, but we ask you to please use your own discernment and do your own research for verification. " These are...

I already answered those questions: 1. The Church in Rome was called the Church in Rome. 2. It wasn't a "name" but a location. 3. Peter was appointed by Christ to "feed His lambs" and "tend his sheep" (John 21:15-19). NONE of the original Bishops/Apostles were ordained by anybody but Christ...

And this angry, ignorant rant is based on the fact that you simply don't know your Bible. The Levitical Law against consuming blood is based on the earlier prohibition from Genesis. It starts out talking about animals . . . Gen 9:3-5 Everything that lives and moves about will be food for you...

First of all - Francis NEVER said that one must be a "ROMAN" Catholic to be a Christian. that is complete nonsense that YOU have falsely stated. "Roman" simply refer to a Liturgical Rite in the Catholic Church. There are about TWENTY Liturgical Rites - and they are ALL in communion with each...

WRONG. You made the claim that since it wasn't specifically in the Bible - Peter was NOT in Rome in post #468: "Paul, Not Simon Peter "taught" the Gospel of Jesus Christ in Rome... Paul, Not Simon Peter "taught" Jews AND Gentile's In Rome. Paul was a Brethren to the Jews, because Paul was a Jew...

Sooooo, if I go to ANY non-Catholic site and pull up ALL manner of bizarre diatribes and theories - can I attribute them as being "genuinely Protestant"? OR - are some of them really off the tracks with their freakish, cult-like screeds? there are PLENTY of sites out there that claim to be...

WRONG. The entire point of my bringing up historical events such as ... The Black Plague of the 14th century The Protestant Revolt of the 16th century The American Revolution of the 18th century ... is that they are NOT specifically mentioned in Scripture. YOU seem to think that unless...

This is a LIE. The Pope doesn't say that salvation is through him. This would be heresy. Don't assume . . . And once again - YOU made the false claim that the Catholic Church teaches that we "earn" our way into Heaven - which is a LIE. How can you be expected to be taken seriously when you...

WRONG. This is a dissident "Catholic" site which promotes radical Traditionalism and denounces the Catholic Church. It is NO better or trustworthy than any other anti-Catholic site.

Uh huh - so WHY is it that these are the SAME Early Church Fathers that Protestants quote when they are trying to prove their doctrines?? Can YOU say, "Hypocrisy"? Either they were just a bunch of LOST souls who were into hocus-pocus and idolatry - or they were REAL Christians. If they were...

God doesn't "need" to do anything. He doesn't "need" me - and He certainly doesn't "need" YOU. God does things for OUR benefit - because He loves us. We can either accept them or reject them as YOU have . . .

I proved you wrong about the use of the terms "Teacher" and "Father" - and what Christ was telling the crowd. YOU and others here erroneously believe that NOBODY is to be called Father or Teacher - and I showed you that this was NOT the point He was making.

Why would you say that?? I know MANY poorly educated Protestants who don't know their faith either. What does that say about Protestantism??

Not sure what you're talking about - but I've never heard ANY Christian say that Christmas and Easter traditions are "above" scripture. You're throwing blind punches into the air . . .

And I already obliterated this moronic position back in post #2236. Here it is again - in case you missed it . . . Time for another linguistics lesson . . . From Macmillan Dictionary: 1. REPRESENTING someone or something Ex. - They said they came “in the name of peace.” From Cambridge...

Ummmm, can you show me where the Bible makes this idiotic claim? Chapter and Verse, please . . .

The desperate words of a person who has publicly LOST another argument. I've already shown you the verses of Scripture that prove the Trinity. WHY is it that you can't refute them?? Gen. 1:26, Matt. 28:19, John 15:26, 1 Cor. 12:4-6, 2 Cor. 13:14, 1 John 5:7, Eph. 4:6, Psalm 68:5, Mal. 2:10...

In other words - the linguistic evidence I presented destroys your entire position about Baptizing "in the name of" Jesus Christ. Game. Set. MATCH.