Search results

It is the saddest thing that those justified, those for whom God went to such extraordinary lengths should reject his free gift. It is the saddest thing that many would misrepresent this gift as of one who is tight fisted and exclusive and creates people for the very purpose of destroying them...

I was shipwrecked some years ago and ended up on the north east coast of New Britain, a province of Papua/New Guinea The natives took care of me......After some time I was invited to the funeral of a child. I was watching the proceeding from the sidelines when one of the guys I had got to know...

No problems, slurp up the pig fat and snot from the filters of the sea and hope for a long healthy life! Edit...oh, and keep the economy healthy by patronising Macca's and Wendy's ingesting plenty of their sensory tid bits, after all its not what goes into a man that defiles him but what comes...

what has it got to do with the subject at hand?

yeah, keep it up....it's such a great example of glowing vitality!

You have missed the mark again Curtis so I will refresh your knowledge. The ceremonial laws were types....they pointed to Jesus, all in their specific way....that was their purpose and role. The food laws were health laws. They were not 'ceremonial'.....thats not too difficult to distinguish...

You are not hearing my question. What was their purpose????

It’s quiet clear to me T7x7 that your reference point for making a determination are your senses.....if it tastes good, indulge it! Using that principle is there any reason not to indulge converting, or adultery or theft?....oh wait, that’s right, the law’s been done away with, I can now eat...

How where they ceremonial?...or maybe it’s better to ask if you understand what ‘ceremonial’ is ie, what it applies to?

It is not self evident at all. You have not explained you how it is ceremonial. I said nothing about it being moral so why splice that in?

How was the prohibition of eating unclean animal laws ceremonial in nature?

Well presented!

Hello

No man has the right to force the conscience or actions/choices of another; that is the realm of a spirit opposed to Jesus. Making decisions for the sake of pleasing others has short legs and only gives permission to be further manipulated.

I suppose you know who the covenant people are?...and who they are not?..... because if you tell those who are not the covenant people that God loves them to the point of giving his life for them, you are actually lying to them. Is this not the case?

The great struggle of the believer is that of self condemnation, that of others and what the devil throws at you ‘you are not good enough, you are not good enough, you are not good enough’ At times it’s unrelenting. Amazingly, God’s verdict however is, ‘you are my beloved child; you are loved...

It is clear she wasn’t a virgin for long after Jesus was born yet certain men with foreign ideas feel they can make mileage for their theories by tacking the word ‘virgin’ to her name as if it were perpetual. Anybody who knows the scriptures will not fall for that ruse.

Your subject matter it appears is an obvious projection!

If you knew the scriptures you wouldn’t ask a question of this nature. Your assumptions about my opinions are in error even if I say nothing yet you assume my silence on the matter is a reason to make your charges. I recall those who who arraigned Jesus pursued a similar tactic.

I would ask, are you bi polar?