Search results

Matt. 19:26 Jesus looked at them and said, "With man this is impossible, but with God ALL things are possible." Your lack of faith is appalling . . .

Sure we do. “In His name” means “by His Authority”. Do I need to show you the example of the Knight and the King again??

Why would I call ANY king my “son” is he wasn’t?? The King of Kings commanded His disciples to Baptize in the name of the Son – along with the Father and the Holy Spirit. This isn’t rocket science . . .

Of course you don't Because you lack faith and trust in God . . .

No – “and” makes more sense because “even” is not the only option here. “kai” can be rendered as “and”, “also”, “even” or “indeed”. “And”, “also” and “indeed” and make much more sense – and bolster the Christian position. Your pseudo-Christian, non- Trinitarian position dies here . . ...

Ignorance, sheer ignorance . . .

Another failure to understand Bibical language. Acts 4:12 doesn’t refute my point – it completely supports it: Acts 4:12 “Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.” We’re back to the Knight and the King. “In His name”...

Uhhhhh, no - JESUS said that . . .

It's not that math that's off - it's your failure to comprehend Bibical language.

Understand that simply because a word CAN be rendered a certain way, it's not always the way it SHOULD be rendered - and this is a prime example. The context and flow of the command only makes sens if "kai" is rendered as "and" in this case. This is why I stated that neither you NOR your...

I already did in posts #192 and #193. I'm waiting for your response. I'm ALSO waiting for your response to my post #180. Are you EVER going to address that Scriptural evidence for the Triune Godhead?? If you can't refute the evidence - simply admit it and move on . . .

Complete and total ignorant nonsense. For starters - some of your moronic claims state that Baptism in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit came "later" in history - as late as the Third century. Here is an excerpt from The Didache (Teachings of the Twelve Apostles) -...

Soooooooo, does that mean you CAN'T address post #180, where I gave the Scriptural evidence for the Trinity?? That's what I thought. While you're ignoring that little fact - think about this: Not one single solitary person in the entire Bible ever used the term "Bible". Why do YOU?? Not one...

Another ignorant and asinine comment . . .

How does ONE God = Three??

Matt. 28:19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. In that Catholic Church, the priest says: "I baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit." Ummmmmm, show me how he is...

Nope. Peter understood that Baptizing "in the name of Jesus" was Baptizing by His AUTHORITY. We're back at the example of the knight who declares things "in the name of the king". It doesn't mean that he and the King have the same name. He is declaring by the King's AUTHORITY. Jesus said to...

No - we do exactly what He said to do. We baptize in the name of the Father AND OF the Son AND OF the Holy Spirit (Matt. 28:19). We don't just baptize in the name of "Jesus" like the disobedient do.

I couldn't agree with you more. Christ's Church is ONE. But, because of what prideful, rebellious men did in the 16th century - we now have tens of thousands of disjointed and perpetually-splintering Protestant sects that ALL teach different doctrines yest ALL claim to have the "Truth" - like...

Another asinine comparison. Trinitarians DO "go therefore" and Baptize in the name of the Father AND OF the Son AND OF the Holy Spirit. Heretics don't . . .