Search results

Yes, I am a Christian. There is no political side of Christianity. What's wrong with people of a certain demographic group organizing a government for themselves? Your Christian litmus test has no validity, no applicability. This is why there is no verse in Scripture that espouses what you do...

You think the Left is playing with Trump?

TDS is even more keenly understood in context that Trump's policy position is reacting to the Leftist "Defund The Police" movement. Victims of TDS define a Law & Order President as the antonymn AS IF he will be the agent of tyranny and chaos.

I see. You were right before you were wrong. Gotcha! There is no edification to respond to your other personal attacks. You just cannot admit the Right of Conquest does not apply only for Muslims. For some reason, you are fixated on invoking one Strawman argument after the other, denying the...

I got a letter from Trump stating I am a 1% supporter. Still, I know of no one who worships Trump. So, I challenge your statement and OP as hyperbole. Consider this. Trump's actual position on the subject. If anything, this is valuing truth, not worshipping a man. In short, police should not...

Unreasonable. I see. The OP is not why Christians should support Zion but why civilization should support Zion. See the difference? To say Zion is anti-Christ is absurd. Christ was a Jew from Israel.

Wrong. The document dated 1917 was a result of WWI. Balfour Declaration - Wikipedia

You can claim this but the facts show you refer to it as Rothchild not Balfour.

Your argument is simple - simply subterfuge. From today’s devotional reading. Ezekiel 47:22 New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition 22 You shall allot it as an inheritance for yourselves and for the aliens who reside among you and have begotten children among you. They shall be to...

It’s called the Balfour Declaration not Lord Rothschild. We know you don’t support Zion but you are not able to touch the 6 reasons in the OP that detail why you should.

It did belong to the British via the Right of Conquest.

Yea, OK.

When you resort to personal attack, you've lost the argument. Odd that you want nothing to do with a thread I started that you keep posting to. Odd indeed. But not surprising from someone who cannot touch the reasons civlization should support Zion.

Obviusly, you need to update your concept of what is included with the term AntiSemitism for these 4 main reasons.

So,the proper translation of John 4:22 into modern language is irrelevant to your argument?!

Never read the Gospel of John huh?

We know that will never happen. The Demonrats are much better at circling the wagons to protect their own than the RINO’s.

Putting aside your messed up doctrine, you double down on the point I made. You are seriously comparing arguing with someone with being executed by the State, using anything you say against you! Arguing is a form of Freedom of Speech. This is NOT the scenario Jesus faced in the Star Chamber...

Now this implies the argument is with nonbelievers or those not strong in the faith, as compared to general argument. Which is it?

That's fine for vertical interaction. You are not talking about arguing with God though, right? Regarding horizontal interaction, the verse you cited simply does not apply.