Search results

You cannot enter into Heaven if you are impure - period (Rev. 21:27). Luther had his little myth about "snow-covered dunghills" entering Heaven based on the righteousness of Christ. Christ doesn't "cover" us to make us "look" holy and pure - He MAKES us holy and pure. THAT'S how we get into...

In 2 Macc. 42-46, we see that Judas Maccabeus prays for the men of his army, killed in battle. Verses 44-45 say, “… for if he were not expecting the fallen to rise again, it would have been superfluous and foolish to pray for the dead. But if he did this with a view to the splendid reward that...

Uh huh - and it's STILL not a noun. You called me "an asinine." THINK before you post . . .

No - you're ALL over the place on this topic. YOU have stated that: - Jesus IS human. - Jesus is NOT human. - Jesus is PARTIALLY human. When you finally make up your mind - let me know . . .

Sounds like a gigantic contradiction to me . . .

I place MY faith in Christ – period. Not in His spiritual or human side because His 2 natures are INDIVISIBLE. Unfortunately – YOU and your little buddy, @Taken try to dissect Christ into parts – and therein lies your ignorance – AND your heresy. At the very least, @Taken has pretty much...

And this goes to show that you don’t really understand the concept of Purgatory – or as the Catechism of the Catholic Church calls it – the “final PurIfication of the elect”. This has nothing to do with “second chances.” It has nothing to do with the finished work of Christ on the cross NOt...

Uh huh – and what do you do with 1 Tim. 2:5, where Jesus is called “HUMAN” (Anthropos)?? Paul doesn’t say “like a human” – He explicitly describes Him as a HUMAN. He is BOTH Human AND God (1 Tim. 3:16). You and your buddy @Taken simply throw this verse out because it doesn’t fit your perverse...

Really? Chapter and Verse, please . . .

“Being an asinine”?? Do you even know what this word means?? It’s an adjective – not a noun – and it has nothing to do with a person’s “backside” . . . That being said - I noticed that you didn't address the points I made, as usual. What a surprise . . .

It’s different with a book shop because they aren‘t the authors. There may be books that you might have a problem with but they are simply selling them. It's different with Netfix and this abomination they are airing about a gay Christ and a pot-smoking Mary because THEY produced it. This is...

This is heresy. - and an asinine understanding of Scripture. Both you and your fellow anti-Scripturist, @Taken have been shown the undeniable truth of God: That Jesus Christ, the 2nd Person of the Trinity is both FULLY God and FULLY Human (1 Tim. 2:5, 1 Tim. 3:16, Heb. 2:17). He is not “like”...

Uh huh – and you keep claiming that God doesn’t change – yet you think His Word DOES. It doesn’t. His Sacred Word states explicitly that Jesus Christ is BOTH God and Human (Anthropos) in 1 Tim. 2:5, 1 Tim. 3:16, Heb. 2:17 and others. Remember - cherry-picking only begets confusion. If you...

God is the Author of Scripture - or aren't you aware of this?? He isn't the scribe who wrote it down - but He wrote every word because He breathed it (2 Tim. 3:16).

And that's not what Paul wrote - is it?? Paul called Him "the MAN (Anthropos=HUMAN) Christ Jesus" in 1 Tim. 2:5. You can show me 100 verses where it says "likeness" - but they ALL must be read in context with 1 Tim. 2:5 and Heb. 2:16-17. You lose because you're not Scripturally bankrupt -...

Uh huh - but when you read those verses in CONTEXT with Heb. 2:16-17 and 1 Tim. 2:5, you see that He is HUMAN (Anthropos) as well as God. Context is NOT your friend. You're a cherry-picker . . .

Ummmmmm, show me where 1 Tim. 2:5 says anything about "likeness". It says explicitly, the man (ANTHROPOS) Christ Jesus Do I need to post the definition of "Anthropos" again - or did you read it the other three times I posted it? You have repeatedly failed to properly address this verse because...

I didn't "include" Christ. 1 Tim. 2:5 does. YOU reject this because you are blinded by your own arrogance . .

WOW - you missed the point again. What a surprise . . .

Yes - and my point was not to argue with you - but to show the cowardly hypocrisy of the media at large. They have NO problem attacking Christ because Christians don't usually react violently - so they feel they can get away with it. I was simply posing the question - if there are NO sacred...