Search results

And yet, the linguistic fact remains: Anthropos = HUMAN You LOSE because you think the NT was written in King James English. instead of Koine Greek. You adhere age-old heresy of Docetism that was defeated back in the 4th century.

And according to Sacred Scripture - you're DEAD WRONG . . . 1 Tim. 2:5 For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the MAN (Anthropos) Christ Jesus. The NAS New Testament Greek Lexicon Strong's Number: 444 Browse Lexicon Original Word Word Origin anqropoß...

Just show me where you addressed this and we can move on. Post #, please . . .

Hi Helen - We must remember that Revelation is full of symbolism. Jesus is also described as a slain Lamb (Rev. 13:8). Jesus is truly human and truly God - but He is in his glorified state. After the Resurrection, we read that he was able to change His appearance so as not to be immediately...

He is still human AND God. He has a glorified body - like WE will get at the Resurrection. He no longer has a corruptible body.

No - you can't go anywhere with that because it's nonsense. Neither you nor your fellow genius, can explain why Jesus is called "Anthropos" (HUMAN) in 1 Tim. 2:15. Until you can explain this - you have LOST this argument. Sorry - but that's how a debate works . . . PS - your grammar is still...

I have PLENTY of your "LOL" posts - but no real answers. Are you going to address the use of "Anthropos" in 1 Tim. 2:5 - or are you just going top ask an endless line of questions? Address the use of "Anthropos" please . . .

Gee - at LEAST a few hundred posts and you are STILL unaware that the NT wasn't written in King James English, It was written in Koine GREEK, Einstein. The word, "man" in 1 Tim. 2:5 used to describe Jesus is ANTHROPOS, which means: The NAS New Testament Greek Lexicon Anthropos 1:364,59...

This is the same cowardly hypocrisy that we saw at the Awards shows a few years ago after the bombing at the French magazine "Charlie Hebdo". The Hollywood Elites were all wearing protest buttons that said "I am charlie Hebdo" - as if they were somehow "brave" for showing their solidarity. The...

CRICKETS . . .

You didn't refute anything. I said - refute the use of the Greek term "Anthropos", which means HUMAN man to describe Jesus in 1 Tim. 2:5. If you can't refute it - just admit it and move on . . . PS - you might want to take an English course as well ("Your such idiot"??) . . .

Then why doesn't Netflix go ALL the way and show how "courageous" they are and produce a comedy about a Gay Mohammed?? I wonder how long it would take for literal heads to roll . . . Disgusting cowards like Netflix constantly go after Christianity because they know they can get away with it...

Then, why don't you simply repost your "solid" refutation. It should be easy . . . Refute 1 Tim. 2:5 and its use of the term "Anthropos" (HUMAN man) to describe Jesus.

Soooooo, why don't YOU tell us why you don't believe that Jesus was human?? So far, your arguments have circled the drain . . . YOU said that He walked on water - and no human could ever do that. I showed you that Peter walked on water. YOU said that Jesus raised the dead, which cannot be done...

TRANSLATION: "I can't point you to a post because I was never able to refute your Biblical evidence." Yup - that's what I thought . . .

Chalk up another impotent non-answer for you. Nice job . . .

Ummmmmm, point me to the post where you adequately refuted the NT use of the term "Anthropos" to describe Jesus. As I educated you earlier - Anthropos means "HUMAN" man. Please give me the number of the post where you refuted this.

The "Dynamic Duo" fails again. Funny how ignorant minds think alike . . .

Uh huh - and he STILL walked on water, didn't he? He ALSO raised the dead. So much for your asinine argument that Jesus couldn't be human because humans can't do these things . . .

He STILL walked on water - and he raised the dead.