Search results

Nope - God is ONE - He is manifested in Three PERSONS. ONE God - THREE Persons. Time for another Bible lesson . . . The Father is God Ephesians 4:6 One God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. Psalm 68:5 Father of the fatherless and protector of widows is God in his...

Because that's not what Jesus commanded (Matt. 28:19). We are to do what HE commanded - not what YOU think we should do.. Why are you in such rebellion against the words of Christ?

Dude - you are ALL over the place on this. God (YHVH) is a Trinity. The Son is Jesus. The Father and Holy Spirit have no proper individual names. Get over it . . .

What's the "hint" - that His name is Jesus or Immanuel?? It is Jesus. Immanuel is a Title.

YOUR problem is that you simply do NOT understand Biblical language . . .

Is His name "Wonderful Counselor"?

Nope - just the ones who think he was saying the the Father and Holy Spirit are names "Jesus" . . .

No - YOU'RE wrong for thinking that they are ALL named "Jesus".

I'm never going to change your mind. Only God can reveal the truth to you. Ask yourself this question, however: Were ALL of the Baptisms for 1800 years invalid until some idiot decided that we're only supposed to baptize in the name of Jesus?? Think about it . . .

And this is absolute HERESY. God's name is "YHVH". The Father and Holy Spirit don't have pro[er names, individually.

Another Scriptural perversion and a COMPLETE misunderstanding of WHO Jesus is. First of all - Isaiah.9:6 says that Jesus's "Name" shall be called: Wonderful counsellor, The Mighty God, The Everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. NONE of these were His names. These are titles - and they are...

You didn't address the grammatical example I gave. ALL you did was post the same text TWICE and add different notes. Address the point I made.

That' doesn't mean that Jesus is the Father. Isaiah. 9:6 is an early revelation about WHO Jesus is (God). It is a hint about the Trinity, which had not yet been revealed. Good grief - you guys are open;y and freely perverting Scripture and you don't see it.

Your comparison was NO comparison at all. It was the exact same text, twisted to fit YOUR interpretation. I showed you different grammatical examples of the SAME scenario.

You're twisting Scripture again. Col. 2:9 states: For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form, This says NOTHING about Him being called "Father". If you are going to apply ONE name to ALL Three - then that name is "YHVH" - not Jesus.

Your comparison is ridiculous because all you did was post the exact same text in both cases - and put YOUR spin on it. You didn't look at anything "carefully" - you just added different notes to each one. This is an act of desperation . . .

No - you didn't properly exegete these verses - you offered EISEGESIS, which is your own spin on them. You have perverted ALL of the verses you presented because you have applied your "absolutism" to ALL of them. These are NOT black and white absolutes. they are generalizations. EVERY verse...

Sooooooo, the grammatical examples went over your head?? These are simple, 3rd grade English examples. I recited the address of Mike, John and Tim. This indicates that they live at the SAME address. I recited the address of Mike and of John and of Tim. This indicates that they EACH have a...

This is heresy. You have perverted Scripture. The Father and the Holy Spirit are NOT names "Jesus". Jesus was only named Jesus after He was born as man. John 5:43 means that when Jesus said He came in His "Father's name" - it DOESN'T mean they have the same name. It means that He came by the...

Good grief . . . I highlighted the correct part - you're simply not understanding. "And of" means a separate name for each Person. YOUR point would only make sense if the Persons were separated by a mere comma. Here's another grammatical example: I recited the address of Mike, John and Tim. I...