Search results

Funny how you accuse ME of insults when your text in RED exposes YOU for the exact same thing. Maybe you haven't reached that level of "maurity" yet . . .

Then refute 1 Tim. 2:5, where it says that Jesus was a HUMAN (antropos).

Truly Anthropos, just as it says in 1 Tim. 2:5. Anthropos means HUMAN man. Why haven't you been able to refute this?? Once again - YOUR blunder is that you actually believe the NT was written in King James English. It wasn't . . .

Gee - why don't you try posting one for a change . . .

AND raised the dead (Acts 9:36-43) . . .

TRANSLATION: "I don't have any intelligent responses for your Biblical arguments, so I'll just post idiotic drivel." That's what I thought . . .

The Word is the Son. - the 2nd Person in the Triune Godhead The Son became flesh.

"lazareth"??? Did he live in Nazarus??

Exactly.

Uh huh - and Peter raised Tabitha from the dead. What's your point, Einstein?

Gee, that's a "great" argument - NOT. Just more of your typical deflective nonsense. Consider yourself Scripturally spanked . . .

Unless you can explain your position, your post is worthless. Jesus was killed in the Body He was born in. It was a normal, corruptible human body. By the way, Einstein - "Corruptible" simply means that it could die and decay like everybody else.

No – you consistently screw up by erroneously thinking that the King James Translation is the original language. It is NOT. The New Testament was written in Koine Greek. I have proven you WRONG on this point by using the original Greek text – while YOU are stuck using a translation written...

So, you FINALLY agree that He was born a Human. Good for you . . .

Jesus had a corruptible human body before the Resurrection and a GLORIFIED body after. WHO is arguing with that, Einstein?

Care to elaborate? What exactly did I get wrong? Are you equipped to explain - or should I just expect another idiotic response?

And there you go again thinking that the NT was written in King James English – it wasn’t. It was written in Koine Greek. Funny thing about Scripture – you must read it iin CONTEXT or it doesn’t make sense. YOU have a bad habit of cherry-picking verses to formulate your perverted doctrines...

Sure they did – and I’ve already shown you this about a DOZEN times: Heb. 2:17 For this reason he had to be made like them, FULLY HUMAN IN EVERY WAY, in order that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in service to God, and that he might make atonement for the sins of the people...

Funny how ignorant minds think alike . . . You both keep foolishly referring to this as a “Catholic” belief or MY flawed interpretation. This has been the constant teaching of Christ’s Church for 2000 years and was a point of faith that was NOT contested by the Protestant Fathers. This is...

"Assumed a Human Nature'" means He BECAME a human being. If neither of you geniuses can understand that, then I suggest you both enroll in an intensive English course . . .