Search results

You didn't answer my question. Do you only read the Bible now because you are told to??

WRONG. As I have shown you about a DOZED times now – Scripture implies that Mary was sinless. It’s not MY fault that you’re unable to address Mary’s status as “Kecharitomene”. Why are you so afraid?? Are you every going to address this – or will you continue to dance around it or simply...

Then, please explain what you DID say.

Sooooo, you ONLY read the Bible now because your pastor tells you to??

Uh-huh, just proving once again that YOUR condemnations of Christ's Church mean absolutely nothing . . . Every claim I made is backed up by the full context of Scripture.

No – you didn’t find ANY of what I mentioned in Scripture because it’s NOT there. YOUR challenge was that MARY never claimed to be sinless – and I showed you beyond a shadow of a doubt that: JESUS never claimed to be sinless. ISAIAH never claimed to be a prophet. JOSEPH never claimed to be the...

Now that’s funny. Ummmmmmm, can YOU show me where YOU were given a guarantee that YOU would be led by the holy spirit to ALL truth (John 16:12-15)?? The Bible shows that this guarantee was given to Christ’s Church at large – NOT to the individual. By the way – “ALL truth” includes the...

WHY would Mary go around claiming that she was without sin?? Is this required of her in order to be sinless?? Can you show me ONE verse of Scripture where Jesus claimed to be without sin? Can you show me ONE verse of Scripture where Isaiah claimed to be a prophet?? Can you show me ONE verse...

Conversely – if tens of thousands of different men have tens of thousands of different interpretations that lead hundreds of millions of people in endless directions – how is THIS a good thing?? Are you saying that you can‘t glean anything valuable from a verse that has been interpreted by one...

Uhhhh, no. You posted a few irrelevant verses with ZERO exegesis or explanation. That’s throwing blind punches in the dark – not a Scriptural refutation.

And yet, you learned nothing because of your spiritual laziness. You were just a pew-filler . . .

Because, by your own admission, you refused to own or read a Bible. Shame on you for blaming the Church for YOUR spiritual laziness . . .

Yet, not only has he NOT used Scripture - he hasn't mounted a case at ALL except for his own opinions. STILL waiting for a Scriptural refutation . . .

Wrong. Obedience doesn’t take away ANYTHING from the sacrifice of Christ. Obedience make His sacrifice EFFICACIOUS. His sacrifice does absolutely NOTHING for you without your cooperation. Baptism is OUR response – our cooperation with God’s grace. This is the “obedience of faith” that Paul...

I never posted a single 'insult". I simply told you to READ the posts before responding . . .

With ALL of your Scriptural acrobatics – you have YET to show a SINGLE verse that shows there are different KINDS of men. The verses from 1 Cor. 15 simply differentiate that one man is only human and the other man is BOTH human AND God. Don’t just R*E*A*D the Bible – learn HOW to understand...

Uhhhhh, the Angel “notified” Mary that she was going to become PREGNANT by the Holy Spirit. This is a completely separate issue from her status as “Kecharitomene”. “The Holy Spirit will come upon you” simply means, “You will become PREGNANT by the Holy spirit”, Einstein. Also – the Angel...

Ummmmm, a human being with a glorified body like Jesus is STILL a human being. NONE of what you posted differentiates between human men and some other kind of "men". You can do Scriptural backflips ALL day long and ALL that will make you is a Scriptural Acrobat - but NOT a truth teller. Lie I...

And a Melkite Catholic is NOT a Roman Catholic. And a Maronie Catholic is NOT a Roman Catholic. And a Byzantine Catholic is NOT a Roman Catholic. And a Coptic Catholic is NOT a Roman Catholic. And a Alexandrian Catholic is NOT a Roman Catholic. That's just the way it is . . .

Pay attention . . . Never said that a "title" makes Mary sinless. Her status as "Kecharitomene" makes her sinless.