Search results

How about answering these simple questions instead of avoiding them?

You duck every issue because Premil is devoid of biblical support. The classic old adage is true: If you cannot attack the message attack the messenger. BTW, there is no such word as "ain't"!

Moses employs `a thousand' in Deuteronomy 7:9 saying, "Know therefore that the LORD thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations." Is this a literal or figurative thousand? 1 Chronicles...

You come across as a very angry and bitter person. I understand your frustration at not being able to present us with any corroboration for your opinion of Rev 20 but there is no need for your venomous attacks.

No it does not. Prove it.

This is exactly what you do. You make Rev 20 contradict numerous climactic Scripture that shows the return of Christ to be the end. To enable your beliefs: you insert 1000 years everywhere the Holy Spirit forgot to. Adding unto Scripture is forbidden in the sacred text.

Let us look at the challenging aspect of Isaiah 65:20. It says, “the child shall die an hundred years old; but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.” This verse has confused many Bible students over the years because of its seeming contradictory wording. Whilst...

I totally agree with you. It just doesn't add up.

I agree. This is totally unacceptable.

That is because you have nothing to bring to the table apart from pointless insults.

You need to grasp the context in order to see the meaning. Peter is refuting the folly of the end-time mockers who are questioning the reality of Christ's appearing. He is basically telling them that time is nothing with the Lord. Their scoffing is misplaced and delusional. The whole thrust is...

· Unquestionably, the focus of this message is directed to the end-time-cynics who question God. · These fools question God keeping His “promise.” What promise? It is “the promise of his coming.” · The scorn and derision of these foolish last days scoffers and mockers are directed...

Do you not mean 2 Peter 3:10?

Ok. I took your advice.

That is not true. He is highlighting the ongoing avoidance and the unfair personal attacks. It is Premils that are ducking around the Op. They obviously have no rebuttal.

Exactly!

Yes, you are being selective, disingenuous and unfair. But what does that matter when it comes to eschatology? As long as it makes my side look good. Avoid the vicious attacks on Premils and deflect the guilt upon Amils. Until Premils address the many contradictions in their position it is hard...

Please stop avoiding the issue. Are the following "filled with vanity" in your opinion - yes or no? Are these Christ-like? “This is hilarious.” "Hogwash!" "Balderdash!” "more hot air!" "You need to repent to Jesus and ask Him forgiveness for denying His Word."

What i said was mild and inoffensive. I find your complaint diengenious, selective and unfair, as you totally ignore the slights and slanders of your Premil colleagues in this same thread, taunting Amils: “This is hilarious.” "Hogwash!" "Balderdash!" "more hot air!" "You need to repent to...

What are you talking about "repent"? This is utter pride. You seem to think you know it all. You need to look in the mirror and preach to yourself.