Search results

The Magi are an historical group. You can look this up. But in a fundamentalist environment it would cause to much grief to talk to much about it. I say that the word means sorcerers and witches, but the term witches had not been coined yet...Do not suffer a witch to live....that cannot be in...

It does in fact support it 100%. Every scripture that, that word is used in, I gave you. It is no surprise to me... I have been in Kingdom Halls. I know what you people do. It is all about picking what you like and attempting to explain away what you don't like. My patience with you is only...

LOL Only if you understood as well as I! It would be clear to you.

Act 2:38 Ya know Christ said, Why do you call me Lord Lord and not do what I say. Faith + repentance + baptism + the bread and wine ritual.....which one does what and when? Can we make a test where someone does not do one of these things and see what happens? Not me! Why not do what you are...

And they call it rebellion.

Non-water baptism is not a tradition in Christianity, simple as that. Christ got baptized by water and there are examples of water baptisms and no scriptures that say water baptism is not necessary. The Apostles new that there would be those of rebellious nature and explained what would happen...

Well you can't tell God what to do. LOL But I would not make it a rule to set new people in the church in a corner waiting for the Baptism of the Holy Spirit first.

I know the Bible backward and foreword, thank you. There is a lot of scriptures about baptism, they just call it Baptism because they don't think everyone is a imbecile. Again go find a scripture that "actually says" water Baptism is not necessary. There are scriptures that put it in...

The topic: The Magi worshipped Christ. She said....The magi did not "worship" Jesus. Obeisance is not worship. Now she says the definition of the word and all the scriptures I provided as to how the word was used in the NT is a weak argument. Another person that does not believe that...

Ya...sons of God are not angels or humans. Angels do not reproduce.

I disagree.

I am not going to get into a debate with a Jehovah's Wittiness on this topic because it will go south real quick. The patience I have shown you is because you are female....not that I have any respect for your religion.

We that is the way the Bible describes it worship so argue with the Bible.

I have already explained this and proved you wrong with several scriptures.

Angels do not reproduce. The Bible does not say the sons of God are angels.

I disagree. Angels do not reproduce....spirits in prison are not angels....only one place to go...Sheol and there were a lot of disobedient people in Noah's day that ended up as spirits in Sheol. Christ went to the spirits in Sheol to preach the Gospel....a lot of debates on this.

What sense would it make for God not to want anyone to know His name or say His name in reverence. So why did they remove God the Father's name and God the Son's name completely from the Old and New Testaments! Still not the point. Justifications and explanations of wrong doing. A lot of...

This is one of the explanations that I have heard, and only partially agree with. But as God said, do not use His name in vain. It was never His intent to remove it from normal conversations that were respectful.

When did Satan become the enemy of God? That is the point of this conversation? This conversation is not about if Satan is the devil or is a devil in the NT....that is clear. But when was the fall of angels? When did Satan become the enemy of God and Mankind. The OT style is consistent with...

God and Satan agreed to test Job. Pretty rude test, I agree. As the story goes God does not object to the way Satan tested Job and it proved Job's faith in God. Of course along the way Job said things that he would have to recant and repeat. Then in chapters 38, 39, 40, and 41 God rebukes /...