Search results

No - it doesn't say that we are "ALL" saints, kings and priests. Christ Himself said that there were wolves among his flock - false prophets and false disciples (Matt. 7:15-23). NEVER did He say that "ALL" were saints, kings and priests. That's YOUR perversion of the Gospel . . . Do your...

Once again, your total ignorance of ALL things Catholic is at the root of your asinine posts. However - it IS funny how you keep pointing fingers at the Catholic Church and “pedophile priests” when this filth is going on in your OWN SDA backyard . . ...

Really?? Tell me – where does the Bible state which Books belong in it? Where is the revealed?? This truth was revealed to Christ’s CHURCH – and NOT in Scripture. At the Last Supper, Jesus told His Apostles that the Holy Spirit would guide the Church to ALL Truth(John 16:12-15). He said...

“Papa” simply means “Father” – and EVERY Bishop and Priest is called “Father”. The OFFICE of the Papacy, however, has ONLY been in Rome and the unofficial title of “Pope” has ONLY been given to the Bishop of Rome. The onus is on YOU to disprove this and show that it was also used for others.

Since when are YOUthe one who gets to define what doctrineis?? Or reproof or instruction in righteousness?? These are YOUR definitions – but they may not be the definitions of the Elm St. Baptist Churchdown the road or any of the other tens ofthousands of disjointed and perpetually-splintering...

Not really sure what game you’re playing but Peter WAS the first Pope. For the third time - it is a term of endearment – not an official title like “Bishop of Rome”. In other words, it is just a nickname for the Bishop of Rome – period. You’re trying to say that just because the nickname was...

This is nonsense – not “history” . . . As I stated earlier – “Pope” or “Papa” is NOT an official title of the earthly leader of the Catholic Church. This is simply a term of endearment and nothing else. As I presented earlier - he has 8 official Titles – and NONE of them are “Pope” or “Papa”...

The Bible is the WRITTEN Word of God. It does not encompass the ENTIRE word of God. John said that if everything had been written about what Jesus did and said – the world couldn’t contain the books written about it (John 21:25). And you can quote 2 Tim. 2:16-17 all day long – and it STILL...

Like I said - when YOU stop lying. Face it - you don't like me because I expose your lies . . .

This speaks to the importance of Scripture and that it is PROFITABLE. NOWHERE does it say that it is our SOLE Authority. Try again . . .

Yes, you keep regurgitating this nonsense - but so far have FAILED to provide me with even ONE example, Einstein . . . And this is yet another of your big fat SDA LIES. NOWHERE does the Church place Tradition ABOVE Scripture. I openly challenge you to provide me with ONE official teaching from...

And I love it when ignorant anti-Catholics accuse Catholics of things without providing any proof. Show me where Scripture supports Sola Scriptura. Chapter and Verse, please . . .

No - in the annals of HISTORY, as I amply showed in the list of quotes from the Early Church in post #519 . . .

If you're arguing about the OFFICE of the Papacy, you are wrong - and the quotes I provided prove this. If you are arguing about the WORD "Pope" - there is no official title of "Pope". It is simply a term of endearment that means "Papa" or "Father" and it developed over time. His official...

Why do YOU keep asking the same question - after I explain it to you?? I already explained to you that canonized Saints are simply those the Church has officially recognized. The Church doesn't say that there aren't other saints - and NOWHERE does the bible say that we are ALL saints. As for...

Your hatred of Christ's Church is only surpassed by your abject ignorance of it. First of all - just as in the Old Testament, there are THREE levels of Priesthood in the New Testament: In the OT, there was the High Priest. Then there were the Levitical/Ministerial Priests. Finally, there was...

Really?? Simple history?? Here's some "simple history" that proves your comments wrong . . . Irenaeus But since it would be too long to enumerate in such a volume as this the succession of all the churches, we shall confound all those who, in whatever manner, whether through self-satisfaction...

Yup - Jesus knew He was the Rock. And since He is the Word of God (John 1:1) - He ALSO knows that Abraham is the Rock (Isa. 51:1-2) and Peter is the rock (Matt. 16:18).

NONSENSE. As usual, you cherry-pick when you should be reading all of Scripture in context. There are multiple uses and contexts for "Water" (Isa. 12:3, 2 Sam. 22:17, Ezek, 36:25-26, Matt. 3:11, Heb. 10:22) - just as there are multiple uses for "Rock" in Scripture. Most anti-Catholics will say...

This is nonsense. I already showed you that BOTH Abraham (Isa. (51:1-2) and Peter (Matt. 16:18) are referred to as "The Rock". So, unless you are rejecting the Word of God, you must recognize this . . . As for the "stone" and "cliff" reference - I also showed you that this argument goes right...