Search results

Sounds unlearned because you don't know what took place per Acts 9? At first Saul did not know what was happening until when he called out to Jesus and called Him "Lord". You don't think The Lord can get your attention to 'know' beyond all doubt who He is? Have more Faith.

And you can try and come up with 1,000 excuses not to believe the Genesis 6 and Jude 6-7 Scripture as written, and it still will not change the existence of a hybrid giant race per Old Testament history.

You will... be here, if you don't die first. There is NO rapture PRIOR to the "great tribulation". And I like the photo image of one holding a suitcase in one hand while looking up to the sky, and in the background WWIII is going on. I think that's cute, not completely accurate since the END is...

That's pretty much a stoic REJECTION of the Jude 6-7 Scripture pointing directly to Genesis 6. There's no help for you on this matter, God has blinded your spiritual eyes, you'll have to wait until Lord Jesus returns to understand this present world and what it is really about per God's written...

No, Apostle John in 1 John 3:2, and Apostle Paul in Romans 8, declared that 'now', we are the "sons of God". That label indeed is about the heavenly order, but so is our spirit-soul that is in our flesh bodies while still walking upon this earth. At flesh death, our spirit with soul leaves our...

That is Bible butchering. No excuse for it, not even in jesting.

No, it is not here... yet. But 'they' are coming with Satan, just like the Revelation 12:7-17 Scripture is pointing to, which will be about the "great tribulation" time. That time has not started yet today, and means the latter half of Daniel's symbolic "one week", the latter 1260 days of this...

Per Scripture though, angels when appearing on this earth, they are still... in their angelic body form. Nowhere does God's Word teach that angels must put on flesh just to appear on earth to flesh man; but that false idea is what many think. Jude 6-7 exists to explain... the difference of what...

What audacity... it takes for someone to make such a FALSE CLAIM that someone in our modern era came up with the idea of the angels mating with flesh woman and produce the hybrid giant race? For sure, it shows not only that person's Biblical illiteracy, but also their illiteracy about Christian...

And yet another.... one deceived by their cherry-pickin' of Bible Scripture. Firstly brethren, those who refuse to believe those "sons of God" of Genesis 6 were angels cannot try to use Jesus' description about those of the resurrection being 'as the angels of God in heaven'. Why? Because...

The early Church well understood about the Nephilim (giants) produced from the mating of angels with woman. It's sad that so many of the crept in unawares have sneaked into the Christian Church today that are trying to remove this Biblical teaching, especially in light of Lord Jesus' warning...

And that's your right to think I'm wrong, but I am not wrong about the false doctrines of Amillennialism, and it's so easy to disprove, which is exactly what my post #29 above did, BY THE SCRIPTURES. Therefore, that proof, FROM GOD'S WORD AS WRITTEN, is what disagrees with that Amillennial...

I don't buy your brand of philosophy for one second, because Jesus of Nazareth is GOD The Son. His Spirit never changed when He was born in the flesh through woman's womb. And He ONLY was without sin while in the flesh. What you fail to understand about His suffering from being in the flesh is...

Where in Revelation 13 does it say, "false prophet"? It doesn't, does it? No, it doesn't. The name of the 2nd beast it gives is the "another beast". Rev 13:11-13 11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. 12 And he...

What I believe is because of what is actually 'written' in God's Word, and not some doctrine of men devised by those whom God did not call.

Yes, we possibly still do, because the Revelation 13:1-2 verses about the beast that comes out of the 'sea' is the kingdom beast, not the king. But the later "another beast", a second beast, is the king. Yeah, kind of. The "little horn" and "vile person" are the same idea, and is about the...

Yeah, it DOES say they HAD sexual intercourse with woman, it is written in Genesis 6: Gen 6:1-4 1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, 2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them...

That is the false idea of men's doctrine called Amillennialism. It started in the 2nd century as a doctrine of men that crept into the early Churches, about the same time that the pagan Gnostics began creeping into the Church and trying to paganize Christian doctrine. All the below Scriptures...

Genesis 6 shows that those angels saw the daughters of men, that they were fair (beautiful). That reveals those angels lusted... after flesh woman, and this is likely the idea of their going after 'strange flesh' per Jude 6-7 involving fornication. It suggests they wanted the same privileges...