Search results

That was on another thread. Stick to the conversation on the thread at hand. Perhaps that "late night" was your issue . . . No - how about discussing that matter on that thread instead of hijacking this one??

Careful - your ignorance is showing again . . . Doctrine and discipline are NOT the same thing nor do they carry the same weight. A good example of a discipline is abstaining from meat on Fridays - or having an unmarried priesthood. Disciplines can and DO change - such as the above mentioned...

ALL who are saved are saved BY the grace of God BY the blood of Christ - but they are saved THROUGH the Church. If you're trying to get me to say that only Catholics will go to Heaven - you're barking up the wrong tree. The Church doesn't teach this.

I didn't just "claim" that you posted those verses out of context - explained to you HOW you posted them out of context. Your understanding of the Word of God is very limited . . .

Then Paul and John are blasphemers. And since they were inspired by the Holy Spirit (GOD) to write what they wrote - then you are calling GOD a hypocrite. BOTH of them speak to themselves sinning and having sin in their lives (Rom. 7:12-25, 1 John 1:8).

I understand that it is easy to get the wrong impression from a conversation if there are no references. I will try to include them in the future. As for your question in RED - I have had MANY conversations with @Taken over the years and have gleaned this information from those conversations...

Actually - you never even threw a pitch because you took ALL 3 verses out of context. 1 John 3:6, 9 is talking about living a life of sin. Christians don't live a life of willful sin - we stumble secause we are imperfect. We strive NOT to sin but we still stumble - as Paul admits in Romans...

Then the simplest solution to this communication gap is to answer a few questions: a) Were you forgiven of ALL of your past sins? b) Has God erased those sins and hold you no longer accountable? c) Have you stopped sinning since being born again? If your answer is "Yes" to all of the above -...

That shows your ignorance. This is NOT a doctrine but a DISCIPLINE. I suggest you learn the difference before making your usual false claims.

Why are you dancing around the issue?? “Them” includes YOU and anybody else who claims to have been born again, having an Epignosis of Christ. Scripture warns ALL born again Christians not to fall back into darkness and lose it all . . .

What are you talking about?? This thread is about @Taken's obsession with ME. You must be thinking of another thread . . .

That's because the Christ's Church doesn't change doctrine. Changing doctrines is Protestant territory . . .

You’re dancing again. Either you HAVE sin in your life – or you DON’T. If YOU claim to be forgiven of ALL past sin – and claim you no longer sin – then you are claiming to be WITHOUT sin. It’s that simple. However – as I have shown you on numerous occasions – Scripture disagrees with you (1...

Where can they hear the book of Moses being read to them? "In the synagogues" QED WRONG. Luke wasa NOT a Jew - he was a Greek Gentile. Scholars agree that his writing style proves that he was not Jewish. The idea of your 1st century "Jews Only" club is dying a horrible death in this...

That's just it - you talk out of both sides of your mouth. . FIRST, you say that you no longer sin - and in fact CANNOT sin. THEN you say that you "never claimed" to be without sin. This is a gigantic hypocrisy - and more of your dishonestly . . .

First of all - the Early Church consisted of Jews AND Gentiles, who had NOTHING to do with synagogue teaching. On top of that - MOST scholars agree that Luke was a Greek Gentile - and he WROTE both a Gospel account AND Acts of the Apostles. Secondly - your remarks above in RED are absolute...

Of course YOU would because you don't do your homework. I do . . .

First of all - I never called you "liar" - so that's a lie in itself. Secondly - I am a Catholic. There is no such thing as a "Romanist", ecclesiastically speaking so I don't need to "prove" that. Do your homework before responding . . .

No YOU are incorrect in falsely accusing me of "calling" you a liar. If you can't be honest - then you really shouldn't post . . .

It is prophetic symbolism. - not history. No matter WHO who attribute the symbol to - it is OUTSIDE of time. The one who was born of the Woman destined to rule ALL nations with an iron rod is CHRIST. He was already born - so why aren't you trying to refute that, Einstein??