Search results

You are laughing like a fool about something that I didn't even say. I did not say the verse proves Amillennialism because it disproves Premillennialism. It proves Amillennialism and disproves Premillennialism at the same time because 2 Peter 3:10-13 does not allow for any mortals to be on the...

So, you should understand that the 10 servants in the Luke 19 parable do not represent only 10 literal servants in reality any more than the ten virgins represent only ten people in reality. Of course I do. Did you somehow not know that is a typical Amill belief? Wait, what? Daniel 7:13-14 and...

You are aware that Amills agree with this, aren't you? Right. So far, your understanding of the parable matches the typical Amill understanding. Or, at least the non-partial preterist Amill understanding. Once again you are taking the parable literally by thinking it's talking about ten...

No, I do not. That is another lie from you. You are a big fat liar. LOL. You are so dishonest, it's unbelievable. Did you think I wouldn't notice that you didn't bother indicating where it says in the OT that God's promises made to Abraham and his seed were made to Abraham and his seed, Jesus...

I agree, but I don't really know what that meaning is exactly beyond showing that being faithful will result in being rewarded in some way and neither do you. I'm not sure if there's any scripture which tells us that in detail. Why is that? Clearly, we will receive rewards when Jesus comes...

The harvest and vengeance occur at the same time. Why do you think it has to be different events? There is no basis for believing that. Just because one passage regarding an event does not contain all the same details as another passage about that event doesn't mean they can't be about the same...

No, it's called rude foolishness. If you actually were right, that would be one thing, but you are treating others rudely while being wrong in what you're saying at the same time. It's a bad combination. Everyone here is zealous for the Lord! But, we can't all be right. Saul (later called Paul)...

I couldn't disagree more. In Matthew 13:36-43, Matthew 13:47-50 and Matthew 25:31-46 we can see believers and unbelievers being judged at the same time when Jesus comes at the end of the age. So, clearly, not just believers, but also unbelievers will stand before the judgment seat of Christ...

First of all, do you acknowledge that what I said is true, which is that parables are not to be taken literally the way you were doing? I assume that you do not think Matthew 25:1-13 is about ten literal virgins, for example? I don't know. Scripture does not give us many details about what it...

A Premill accusing an Amill of taking scripture too literally. There's a new one. How does withholding rain correspond with Jesus breaking them with His rod of iron like a vase being shattered into pieces?

This is not surprising, of course, since you tend to look at everything from your Preterist, Postmil perspective. You seem to be forgetting one important thing here. It's a parable! Parables are not meant to be taken literally like this. Parables are made up stories which illustrate truth in...

LOL. I have done that many times, so why should I think that you will pay any attention to what I'm saying now when you never have before? The two witnesses are described as two candlesticks and two olive trees. What is your explanation for that, by the way? In what way can that apply to two...

No, I discovered that you are a liar long ago. Another lie. All you can do is lie, liar. Stop making blanket statements like that, liar. I'm saying SOME of them were, not ALL. And that is obviously true. Do you deny this? Or is it clear to you somewhere in the OT that God's promises made to...

No, you do not agree that there is no basis for people being judged for eternity if man has no responsibility. You said above that "If salvation depended on man's responsibility or action of any kind in the sense of making it come about, no one would be saved". So, what is the basis for anyone...

You apparently don't even understand what that verse is saying. You see the part about God working in us and ignore the part about us working our own salvation. That verse illustrates the cooperation between God and man that I have talked about before which is required for salvation. But, you...

Good point. Here's yet another passage that Premills twist or ignore. The ones who they think Jesus will reign over when He comes again will instead be destroyed, as scripture repeatedly teaches, including in this parable you referenced.

LOL. So, does the reference to "a thousand hills" refer to a literal one thousand hills in Psalm 50:10 then? Psalm 50:9 I have no need of a bull from your stall or of goats from your pens, 10 for every animal of the forest is mine, and the cattle on a thousand hills.

Exactly. Premills completely ignore what the rod of iron is used for. It is used to break/destroy Christ's enemies.

Right. So, I wonder if @Davy agrees or if he is going to stick with his claim that all of the time periods in Revelation are literal and try to claim that Revelation 17:12 refers to a literal one hour (60 minutes)?

It has been happening for almost 2,000 years now. Agree? Paul indicated that the ones who were blinded and cut off in his day could be grafted in again (saved) in his day. The gospel had to be preached to the Gentiles first and then the Gentiles would provoke the blinded and cut off Israelites...