Search results

Respected Protestant historian, J.N.D. Kelley wrote: "It should be observed that the Old Testament thus admitted as authoritative in the Church was somewhat bulkier and more comprehensive than the [Protestant Old Testament] . . . It always included, though with varying degrees of recognition...

God trumps Charles Spurgeon, Einstein . . . Exodus 20:16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

As usual – your complete lack of understanding of Catholic doctrine and dogma is at the core of your confusion. The Canon of Scripture wasn’t “decided” upon at Trent. As I have shown – it had already been decided upon and reiterated SEVERAL times over the 1200 years prior to Trent. It was...

Your dishonest responses expose your abject ignoranceof ALL things Catholic. Not sure what’s more pathetic – your totald or your absolute ignorance . . .

As usual - YOU don’t need any context or point of reference because it’s your job as an ignorant anti-Catholic to take things out of context. You wouldn’t have a point if you didn’t do that. Remember – being an empty barrel may make you louder – but it doesn’t make you right . . .

Luther’s Bible wasn’t compiled until the 16th century. The Catholic Bible had already been around for some 1200 years. That existing Catholic Canon of Scripture was merely CLOSED at Trent, Einstein. The fact is that NOTall Jews adhere the same Canon of Scripture. As a matter of fact – the...

This isn't about those who "refuse" to believe - and that's NOT who the Pope was talking about.. Go back and R*E*A*D the text of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus that I presented in post #79. In your usual stubbornness, you are arguing in circles . . .

From post #41: Jerome wrote: "What sin have I committed if I followed the judgment of the churches? But he who brings charges against me for relating the objections that the Hebrews are wont to raise against the story of Susanna, the Son of the Three Children, and the story of Bel and the...

You mean, like starting this anti-Catholic thread? Your hypocrisy knows NO bounds . . .

It's also "spelled", C-a-t-h-o-l-i-c . . .

As usual, you show a woefully-ignorant understanding of Catholic teaching. Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus speaks for itself - and Pope Francis was simply agreeing with it.

Nonsense. You are adding to what he allegedly said. Read your dishonest and misleading link: "Pope Francis assures atheists: You don’t have to believe in God to go to heaven" He never said this. Yet, in all of your anti-Catholic dishonesty - that's what you are trying to convey. His quote...

Those are precisely the kind of empty, impotent responses I would have expected from a dishonest anti-Catholic . . .

The Jewish Canon of the 1st century was an OPEN Canon. It wasn't closed until AFTER the 2nd Jewish Revolt during the SECOND Century. I have produced quote after quote from Jerome stating that the JEWISH scholars who helped him translate the OT into Latin were the ones who rejected the...

Soooo, celebrating the Resurrection of my Lord and Savior is "self-righteous"?? How so??

In the end, if YOU don't accept my answer - that's YOUR problem, not mine.

The Pope never said there was no Hell. The Pope never said that atheists WILL go t Heaven, etc. I am openly challenging YOU to produce the quotes . . .

And that's YOUR problem, now - isn't it . . .

First, I'll show him YOUR nonsense to which I was responding. Like I've told YOU and the rest of your anti-Catholic friends here: If you want to be rid of me - stay honest and stop all of the anti-Catholic manure. Otherwise, you will have to contend with me and my exposing of your lies . . .

To refer to the celebration of the Resurrection of our Lord as a "pagan ritual" is rude and vile - not to mention blasphemous. The fact that you don't see this speaks VOLUMES about your own lack of faith.