Search results

Why didn't you ask me yourself? Are you aware that the sun does not contain infinite energy? If given enough time it would eventually run out. And the person you're talking to believes time still exists in eternity, so that means the sun would eventually burn out. So, with that being the case...

LOL. Oh, NOW you say that. Why couldn't you have said that in the first place? I missed your point because you failed to make your point clear. And now you turn around and act as if 2 Peter 3:10-12 is the same thing as Revelation 20:15. Can you please make up your mind? Or are you purposely...

Great question! You tell us since you're constantly trying to do that. Even after we tell you you're misrepresenting something we believe, you don't accept that and continue on misrepresenting what we believe. That comes across as though you think you can tell us what we believe instead of us...

It doesn't surprise me. He might be an Amil, but he is very stubborn and has some beliefs all to himself. Or, at least that aren't shared by any other Amils here.

What are you talking about? A pass for what exactly?

You have no evidence to back up what you were saying and that's why this is all you can say in response. LOL! You can't get any more delusional than to insist that something is true while providing absolutely ZERO evidence to back it up. Jerusalem and its temple buildings were indeed destroyed...

To make them angry and want to blame God for their torment or conclude that there is no God since they think if there is a God, He wouldn't allow them to experience that torment. That's the kind of mindset that Satan wants people to have. Where does it say he wouldn't want to do that? Nowhere...

David, how can you think that you understand Amil as well or even better than Amils do? That is completely delusional on your part. Do you think you can't recognize when someone is misrepresenting your view? I'm sure you can, right? Well, so can we. You might not see how you are doing it, but...

Absolutely agree. It's just completely unbelievable that he thinks he understsands Amil more than Amils do and can speak for us. You can't get any more ludicrous than that. As if we don't fully understand what we believe and need him to tell us what we believe? LOL. Unreal. And he denies this...

Again, it's fine if you believe that, and it could be true, but I think because he is so biased towards Premill that he just does not understand some of what we believe. It seems that he doesn't even try to look at things from our perspective. That's how I see it. Regardless, we agree that he...

That same lack of attention to detail is the reason why he believes some things that are not true.

First of all, as WPM pointed out, he wasn't talking about you. You should be embarrassed for not even knowing who he was talking about. Second of all, I have no chip on my shoulder. You just can't handle it when your view is challenged and someone disagrees with you.

No, it does not. Did you not read anything I said? You think you can just claim something and it's true. It's ridiculous. I explained why that is not true. It would be like saying that Christ stop reigning during Satan's little season, which is not the case since scripture says He must reign...

I'm fine with you having that opinion, but we can't know for certain if it's deliberate or not. It could be, but I think he just can't bring himself to look at things from the Amill perspective, so that's why he ends up misrepresenting Amill so often. He can only think of Satan's binding as a...

That is not taught in scripture. If there will be two raptures, then why did Paul only teach about one? Was he somehow not aware of the second one? Do you think you know more than Paul did about the future?

He's not misusing the verse. It shows how Jesus will come. He will bring destruction by way of fire when He comes which is taught in passages like 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10 and 2 Peter 3:10-12 and that is why He compared His coming to what happened in Lot's day. His reason for also comparing His...

Wrong. The church is not gathered before any seals are opened. That is a completely baseless claim. The church is not even gathered yet as of the time of the sixth vial, as evidenced by the fact that Jesus is still saying at that point that He is coming as a thief. Jesus coming as a thief is...

So, you acknowledge that God already raised Christ to sit on David's throne, as it says in Acts 2:29-31? Why would you then try to say God does that when He returns when it's already been done? You don't make any sense. lfh

The context is about what Christ said it's about, so how can you say you accept His interpretation when you say it's about something different than what He said it's about? He related it directly to the disciples fleeing in fear when He was taken to be crucified. You say you accept that, but...

He will not be reigning over anyone for a thousands years with a rod of iron. He will be destroying His enemies with it! You pay no attention to what the prophecy actually says. Psalm 2:7 I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. 8...