Search results

Wrong. Calling evil out may be seen by evil as derogatory. Of course, you give my opponent a pass, directing all your holier-than-thou comments at me. His calling me a fascist, racist, sexist, islamaphobe, etc for opposing Cultural Marxism is not derogatory. No. No. No. Only those who respond...

No. Calling things by their proper name. If you take it as an insult, that’s on you. I’m proud of what I am and represent. You can call me a White, heterosexual, freedom loving, Christian American capitalist all day long.

I think a Cultural Marxists do not have enough loyalty to their nation, specifically the principles that made it great - like truth (not revisionist history), justice (not equality or ‘equity’), private property, limited government and faith in God.

You are such a Cultural Marxist Racist - using Racism to advance your political agenda. How come liberals don’t mention we should feel proud (rather than guilty) to be White?

Yea, he says that. Doesn’t make it true. There is no reason people cannot be and should be HAPPY with their cultural heritage. This includes White peoples.

Oh. Sorry. I've been traveling for a week. I'll have to look at the evidence of the Pentadactyl Limb AND the different animals that "share" it.

Yea, at last count, I learned about 5 mechanisms.

There is no however. The experiment failed to show the basic flaw of evolution; bacteria do not "evolve" into different kinds of animals, like sting rays, birds or squirrels. Sure, we agree that like animals will adapt to their environment and produce like offspring. Yet, they remain the same...

Convenient, which makes it not a scientific hypothesis since it is not testable in any practical sense. Yet, nearly universally believed with no evidence by those who demand absolute proof of God. Consider this vid

Bashing national pride is just another way that shows you are a Cultural Marxist.

LOL. From Darwins book. Have you ever read The Origin of Species? I have. Isn’t evolution supposed to explain The Origin of Species?

So says the fascist.

My dear sir. Cultural Marxism has it backwards. It’s not that minorities were ever competent but rather always the minority, by definition, out of power. Cultural Marxism falsely asserts they are out of power for oppressor v oppressed dichotomies.

No. Truth is absolute. There are not degrees of truth or false. If I tell a big long story and 90% of it is true, it means the remaining 10% is 100% false. So, the key is to divide things discreetly into such absolutes.

Fact.

As I said, there is not one single instance of one kind of animal to another. Funny how absolutely no evidence what so ever caused you to conclude ‘real, beyond any reasonable doubt’ for what you believe. Yet, with mountains of evidence to support we believe, it’s totally unconvincing to...

Here, you pivot again from only what one can experience is real to things can be real if if you can’t experience it. The authority for this pivot is not theologians but quantum mechanics, which you no doubt capitalized to suggest greater authority than it really does. Many Patriarchs -...

That’s Differentia! Also, you pivoted from experience to thoughts.

No, I really do understand evolution and like many scientists, I pontificated it for decades - until I educated myself by entertaining fact-based criticism. See Is Genesis Real?

Again no. Here again , you seem to be equating existence to experience.