Search results

Great question! A sperm is a part of a living being. We know this because it combined with it's mating female equivalent, which does produce a living being. A sperm is a part of a living being, like skin is. Sure, callouses are dead skin but there is also living skin. Your argument is so poor...

You are walking right into the analogy to defeat you. People say a bun is in the often precisely because a fertilized egg is a baby.

Being lost, you have things backwards. It's not acid that has full legal rights but a human being, who has a unique DNA code. Keep things straight and you won't get lost again. :)

Right. No one is condemning homosexual orientation, just homosexual action.

Being lost, you have things backwards. Homosexuality is morally bad, the worst of the worst. A consequence of this bad behavior is not a unique disease but a higher rate on contracting the disease. This has nothing to do with prejudice but judgment.

No. That is not the question. The polls claim is one is born being homosexual, as if the orientation and choice to act or one in the same thing when they are not!

@Lambano is arguing that one sin is not a sin because others are guilty of another sin. It is nonsense. Shows how deprived we have become.

It IS slander when the doubt is not reasonable. Said differently, your doubt does not mean those who testify they way you do not prefer are insane.

Slander does not alter the validity of witness testimony.

Witness testimony is accepted in courts everyday

Cultural Marxism BS really having nothing to do with the abortion issue. Why do you think the minority ought to rule? To avoid the shame of ‘marginalizing’ the minority?

Agreed. The feminization of language seeks to equate feelings with actions. It doesn’t fly. She was born a rapist. She was born a murderer. She was born an adulterer. She was born a homosexual. Nonsense. No matter how anyone feels, there are ACTIONS that flow from a mind who CHOSE such behavior.

IDOL. The idolatry of DOCTRINES is threatened and diminished by those who are not adherents. I have the Book of Mormon. Unfortunately, it is written in KJV style, which I find all but unreadable.

And that is false. You are inventing a standard designed to fail the Biblical narrative. The absence of evidence is not evidence in support of an opposing proposition. You got a nasty Appeal to Ignorance going there.

"Obvious" to you. Let me type this slowly so you understand ... we might use the word "universe" to refer to everything. The ancients used the phrase "heavens and earth" to refer to everything. Consider supporting text. John 1:3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made...

Half the babies aborted are female. Murdering them is okey-dokey?

Prove it. EVEN IF 100% of the women who claim to have their life in danger to being pregnant will die will result in fewer deaths than the vast majority of babies killed for convenience sake.

Exceptions don't make rules. Not every fetus will die in a test tube. So your argument is moot! How does that shoe fit?w

But not for all the other reasons! I've observed that women don't want to justify themselves and be accountable for their actions. If the 0.0000000000001% of women whose lives are TRULY in danger, they can prove that in a court of law. That's EQUALITY. We do that before killing other people...

Irrational. Even if the percentage is 0.0000000000001 that guns are used to save lives, those reasons are enough to not indict people who kill with guns.