Search results

Sin began in heaven with Satan and 1/3 of the angels rebelling. Sin did not begin on Earth. (Of course, the first sins man committed were on Earth) It is preposterous to suppose these heavenly beings were outside of heaven when they rebelled. Indeed it is inherently contradictory. It'd be like...

I’ve come to realize Technically speaking...sin (as with Satan) DOES exist in heaven. Where do you think Satan rebelled from when Christ saw him falling?

Great thread Apache! It’s a question I’ve thought about for a long time. Here are my thoughts. 1. You are correct that the sovereign Creator could have made things different. 2. He chose to have death be the penalty for sin because he decided it is that serious. 3. Otherwise, it sin would...

It's hard to believe the same city that greeted him like that, just a few days later, crucified him. The most brutal and humiliating death known. How mercurial!

Never heard that. What reference from that era states that?

Indeed. The lies easiest to believe are the ones blanketed in truth. A Cultural Marxist Freudian slip. You know what you peddle is not true. You don't even pretend it is true. Like all good Cultural Marxist's, you suppose you can "define" the truth by market tested labels. For instance...

Lately, I've been thinking about how there is sin in heaven. (We know this because heaven is where Satan rebelled from.) This challenges the sacred cow I was raised with as 'heaven' is to be desired for it's lack of problems, e.g., I went to Vacation Destination X and it was heaven. Profound...

Its perspective is all of existence. How all of nature and all his word point to God’s glory. Atheists got nothing.

99.9%. They are incapable of expressing an original thought. That’s the nature of indoctrination.

You're projecting - again. All you do is deny the evidence to maintain your false beliefs. From 'Real Face of Jesus' Revealed in Newsmax Magazine The shroud has been a subject of controversy for some time, but Chandler says major media have largely ignored the new scientific and forensic...

Insolent, especially on a Christian site.

Cultural Marxism I'm saying Cultural Marxism is evil - and you are indoctrinated in it.

Well, you certainly have the Leftists talking points down. Yet, you completely fail to defend the BLM racist agenda or the LBGT sexual deviancy agenda. The Cultural Marxist talking point is to pretending the only basis for opposing it is "phobia," which is patently untrue. See my post on triply...

How the heck did you get on the - we can only talk about salvation - track from this sentence I responded to?

The word is principled. I wrote a principled response. Why do you suppose the details of the OP story must be included with every post? It's not primarily about reconciliation but forgiveness. We've already covered this ground. It takes one to forgive and 2 to reconcile. As I understand the...

Yet, history since then shows it to be true. Not all truth is in Scripture, such as New World.

Sounds like? Who is the center of our lives? A. God B. People who reject Christ? C. People who imperfectly apply Christs commands?

It's AND, not or. Their statement is a triply illogical. 1st, not all emotions are irrational. Appeal to Emotion. 2nd, it supposes the only basis to oppose their agenda is emotional. False Alternative. 3rd, it supposes the emotional response to their agenda is irrational. Ad Homenim. Truth...

Correct. Just saying those who oppose a premise are irrational does not automatically make your premise correct. Otherwise, You are Christophobic, means Christian ethics is automatically right and you wrong for opposing it, right?

Wow! That says a lot. I suppose revival is all about seeing things anew.