Search results

The part in 2 Thess 1:7-8 that talks about Him coming to take vengeance on those who don't know God and don't obey the gospel refers to Jesus physically destroying His enemies when He comes. The punishment referenced in verse 9 refers to eternal punishment that will soon follow that at the...

Yes, it does. It says it will happen when Jesus comes again. You're not reading 1 Corinthians 15:22-23 as one narrative, but it is. In verse 22, Paul says that all will be resurrected and then he proceeds to say there is an order to the resurrections. He reiterates that Christ's resurrection was...

No. Him coming "in flaming fire" has nothing to do with lightning. That phrase is not related to Him coming quickly like lightning flashes from east to west. Him coming in flaming fire is talking about this... 2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which...

Yes, it's perfect just as it is written. It's too bad that you don't understand it and interpret it in such a way that contradicts other scripture. You've made it clear that you don't care for Paul's teachings at all, but you don't want to talk about that since your interpretations of other...

I remember that you are a liar. Hard to forget. Show me where I said that Revelation 20 makes no sense to me. Good luck. Explain to everyone why you think lying is okay. It's not. It's a sin. Repent of your sin.

So, you won't fess up to your lie? I have never said that Revelation 20 makes no sense to me. Why do you think it's okay to lie?

But, you don't want to tell me what you think it means? I'm asking you to tell me what you think it means for the new covenant to be fulfilled. Am I asking too much? If you know what it means, then please tell me so that I don't have to guess as to what you think that means. It doesn't have to...

My point stands. It's not talking about the judgment of nations or people groups. Matthew 25:31-46 describes the judgment of individuals. People groups as a whole will not inherit "the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world". People groups as a whole will not be cast into...

Your version of the day of the Lord doesn't match up with what is described in passages like 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3 and 2 Peter 3:10-12. Those passages have the day of the Lord arriving unexpectedly bringing sudden and complete destruction on the earth. Yes, it is. It brings sudden destruction...

What are you talking about? No Amils believe in an earthly millennial kingdom. It's not just him who doesn't believe in that. SDAs believe no one is on earth during the thousand years and have that belief to themselves. They are premil in that they believe the thousand years follows Christ's...

I have never said that. Do you not have anything to offer but lies?

Do you not believe that people are judged right after their resurrection? Why else does John 5:28-29 talk about all of the dead either being resurrected unto life or unto damnation? That implies that people are judged immediately after their resurrection, so that would place the timing of the...

I think the takeaway from those verses is that they use the word anazao to refer to the actual act of being resurrected or coming to life while the word zao is never used that way. It is used in Revelation 2:8 to describe Jesus being alive at the time Revelation was written despite previously...

Are you joking? Yes, of course I am. How could you not know that? I don't exactly make that a secret.

Nope. That's not at all what He said. He said all in the graves would be resurrected. Not just all Israelites in the graves. You're changing the text to fit your doctrine. I suppose you would try to say that He was only talking about the resurrection of Israelites in verses like this one, too...

You are a robot. Just say the same thing over and over again. I could say the same about the following text that your interpretation of Revelation 20 contradicts. John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, 9 And shall...

This is all that comes up when I reply to post #368. What do you think you're proving in what you quoted me as saying? It looks like I have consistently maintained there is nothing in the text of Daniel 9;24-27 to indicate a gap between the 69th and 70th weeks. So, what is your actual point...

Are you aware that we've had this discussion several times before or am I the only one who remembers any of our past discussions? You act like this is the first time we've ever discussed this, which is just comical. The word zao there in Rev 2:8 is not a reference to His resurrection itself...

No, I call you that for saying there is no interpretation of the word of God required. To say that implies that you can figure it all out with your own intellect without needing any help from the Holy Spirit. Even though Paul himself said we need discernment from the Holy Spirit to understand...

So, you have no interest in backing up your claims and explaining your conclusions. You share your opinions while expecting them to not be challenged, which makes no sense on a forum like this. So be it. You have a good day, too.